Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36878857›Full record

ReviewThe American surgeon2023

Splenic Salvage: Is There a Role for Splenorrhaphy in the Management of Adult Splenic Trauma?

Kathryn Atkins, Andrew Schneider, Anthony Charles

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American surgeon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryn AtkinsDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Andrew SchneiderDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-7808
Anthony CharlesDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

TRAUMA RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPT32GM008450 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Bruce A Cairns, Anthony G Charles · 1992 to 2026
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNonoperative management of splenic injuries is recommended. Total splenectomy is the primary operative management, and the current role of splenorrhaphy in splenic salvage is not well delineated.

methodsWe reviewed the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2019) for adult splenic injuries. Operative splenic injury management were compared. We performed bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression to estimate the effect of surgical management on mortality.

results189,723 patients met the inclusion criteria. Splenic injury management was stable, with 18.2% undergoing a total splenectomy and 1.9% splenorrhaphy. Splenorrhaphy patients had lower crude mortality (2.7% vs 8.3%,

conclusionAdults with splenic injuries requiring operative intervention have twice the odds of mortality when a total splenectomy is performed or when splenorrhaphy fails compared to successful splenorrhaphy.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesSplenic DiseasesWounds, NonpenetratingAdultHumansSplenectomyacute care surgerytraumatrauma acute care

Identifiers

PMID36878857
PMCPMC11702913
OpenAlexW4323304943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.