Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36878655›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2023

Prevalence of polypharmacy in pregnancy: a systematic review.

Astha Anand, Katherine Phillips, Anuradhaa Subramanian, Siang Ing Lee, Zhaonan Wang, Rebecca McCowan, Utkarsh Agrawal, Adeniyi Frances Fagbamigbe, Catherine Nelson-Piercy, Peter Brocklehurst and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Sterol biosynthesis, brain development, and disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Astha AnandInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Katherine PhillipsInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0674-605X
Anuradhaa SubramanianInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Siang Ing LeeInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2332-5452
Zhaonan WangInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rebecca McCowanUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2379-892X
Utkarsh AgrawalDivision of Population and Behavioural Sciences, University of Saint Andrews School of Medicine, St. Andrews, UK.
Adeniyi Frances FagbamigbeDivision of Population and Behavioural Sciences, University of Saint Andrews School of Medicine, St. Andrews, UK.
Catherine Nelson-PiercyGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Peter BrocklehurstInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Christine Damase-MichelCHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Maria LoaneInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, University of Ulster, Belfast, UK.
Krishnarajah NirantharakumarInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK k.nirantharan@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6816-1279
Amaya Azcoaga-LorenzoDivision of Population and Behavioural Sciences, University of Saint Andrews School of Medicine, St. Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3307-878X
MuM-PreDiCT Group
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V005243/1Medical Research Council MR/W014432/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe use of medications among pregnant women has been rising over the past few decades but the reporting of polypharmacy has been sporadic. The objective of this review is to identify literature reporting the prevalence of polypharmacy among pregnant women, the prevalence of multimorbidity in women taking multiple medications in pregnancy and associated effects on maternal and offspring outcomes.

designMEDLINE and Embase were searched from their inception to 14 September 2021 for interventional trials, observational studies and systematic reviews reporting on the prevalence of polypharmacy or the use of multiple medications in pregnancy were included.Data on prevalence of polypharmacy, prevalence of multimorbidity, combinations of medications and pregnancy and offspring outcomes were extracted. A descriptive analysis was performed.

resultsFourteen studies met the review criteria. The prevalence of women being prescribed two or more medications during pregnancy ranged from 4.9% (4.3%-5.5%) to 62.4% (61.3%-63.5%), with a median of 22.5%. For the first trimester, prevalence ranged from 4.9% (4.7%-5.14%) to 33.7% (32.2%-35.1%). No study reported on the prevalence of multimorbidity, or associated pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to polypharmacy.

conclusionThere is a significant burden of polypharmacy among pregnant women. There is a need for evidence on the combinations of medications prescribed in pregnancy, how this specifically affects women with multiple long-term conditions and the associated benefits and harms. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Our systematic review shows significant burden of polypharmacy in pregnancy but outcomes for women and offspring are unknown. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021223966.

Indexed as

FamilyPolypharmacyFemaleHumansMaleMEDLINEMultimorbidityPregnancyPrevalenceEPIDEMIOLOGYMaternal medicineOBSTETRICS

Identifiers

PMID36878655
PMCPMC9990613
OpenAlexW4323348764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.