ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2023
Cell-Based Therapies: Strategies for Regeneration.
Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ascl1 Represses Müller Glial and Promotes Rod Photoreceptor Fate Through Repressing Notch Signaling in Late Retinal Progenitor Cells.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- A Single Cell Atlas of the Newt Iris During Lens Regeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Development of Retinal Astroglia.Annual review of vision science · 2025Review
- Depletion of Polypyrimidine tract binding protein 1 (ptbp1) activates Müller glia-derived proliferation during zebrafish retina regeneration via modulation of the senescence secretome.Experimental eye research · 2025Article
- Recent progress of principal techniques used in the study of Müller glia reprogramming in mice.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2024Review
- Recent Progress in Photoreceptor Cell-Based Therapy for Degenerative Retinal Disease.Stem cells translational medicine · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neural retina of mammals, like most of the rest of the central nervous system, does not regenerate new neurons after they are lost through damage or disease. The ability of nonmammalian vertebrates, like fish and amphibians, is remarkable, and lessons learned over the last 20 years have revealed some of the mechanisms underlying this potential. This knowledge has recently been applied to mammals to develop methods that can stimulate regeneration in mice. In this review, we highlight the progress in this area, and propose a "wish list" of how the clinical implementation of regenerative strategies could be applicable to various human retinal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.