Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36877732›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

Epidemiology of secondary infection after snakebites in center-west Brazil.

João Victor Soares Coriolano Coutinho, Taiguara Fraga Guimarães, Bruno Borges Valente, Lísia Gomes Martins de Moura Tomich

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Thromboinflammatory complications ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antibiotic Therapy and Prophylaxis for Snake-Bitten Patients.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. The Chinese guideline for management of snakebites.World journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

João Victor Soares Coriolano CoutinhoInstitute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5596-1835
Taiguara Fraga GuimarãesInstitute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Bruno Borges ValenteState Hospital for Tropical Diseases (HDT), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Lísia Gomes Martins de Moura TomichInstitute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade de Rio Verde · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSnakebites represent a significant health problem in tropical countries, with an annual incidence of 2.7 million cases worldwide. The incidence of secondary infections after snake bites is also high and is usually caused by bacteria from the oral cavity of snakes. Morganella morganii has been identified as an important cause of infections and has been guiding antibiotic therapy in several regions of Brazil and the world. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe performed a retrospective cross-sectional evaluation of snakebites in hospitalized patients between January 2018 and November 2019 and selected those with secondary infection in their medical records. During the period, 326 cases of snakebites were treated, and 155 (47.5%) of them eventually had secondary infections. However, only seven patients underwent culture of soft tissue fragments, in which three cases were negative culture results, while Aeromonas hydrophila was identified in four cases. Of these, 75% were resistant to ampicillin/sulbactam, 50% had intermediate sensitivity to imipenem, and 25% had intermediate sensitivity to piperacillin/tazobactam. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) was not tested on any strain. Of the 155 cases that progressed to secondary infections, 48.4% (75) were empirically treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate, 41.9% (65) with TMP-SMX, and 32 (22%) of these 144 cases required a change to a second regimen, and 10 of these 32 patients required a third therapeutic regimen.

conclusionWild animals act as reservoirs of resistant bacteria because their oral cavity favors biofilm formation, which explains the finding of A. hydrophila with a reduced sensitivity profile in this study. This fact is essential for the appropriate choice of empirical antibiotic therapy.

Indexed as

CoinfectionSnake BitesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesRetrospective StudiesTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID36877732
PMCPMC10019779
OpenAlexW4323294370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read27
identifiers read4
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.