Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36877731›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

Comparative analysis of diagnostic methods for the detection of Cryptococcus neoformans meningitis.

Katia Cristina Dantas, Roseli Santos de Freitas-Xavier, Suzete Cleusa Ferreira Spina Lombardi, Alfredo Mendroni Júnior, Marcos Vinicius da Silva, Paulo Ricardo Criado, Vera Lúcia Teixeira de Freitas, Terezinha Morato Bastos de Almeida

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Optimized In-House Protocol forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katia Cristina DantasDepartment of Pathology, Sao Paulo University Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1346-9003
Roseli Santos de Freitas-XavierMedical Mycology Laboratory-LIM 53/HCFMUSP and Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Suzete Cleusa Ferreira Spina LombardiDivision of Research & Transfusion Medicine, Pro-Blood Foundation/Blood Center of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Alfredo Mendroni JúniorLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Targeted Therapy in OncoImmuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hospital das Clínicas -HCFMUSP, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos Vinicius da SilvaEmilio Ribas Institute of Infectious Diseases, Consultant, Ministry of Health, Department of Medicine, Catholic University of Sao Paulo, and Professor, Program in Postgraduate Sciences and Coordination of Disease Control, Department of State Health, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Ricardo CriadoFull Researcher at ABC Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vera Lúcia Teixeira de FreitasLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Imunology (LIM-48), Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Sao Paulo University Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Terezinha Morato Bastos de AlmeidaDepartment of Oncology, Radiology and Oncology, São Paulo University Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRFaculdade de Medicina do ABC · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCryptococcosis is a devastating opportunistic infection in immunocompromised individuals, primarily in people living with HIV/AIDS. This study evaluated a protocol for the early diagnosis of meningitis due to C. neoformans, utilizing established molecular techniques from serum and CSF samples.

methodsThe 18S and 5.8S (rDNA-ITS) sequence-specific nested PCR assays were compared with direct India ink staining and the latex agglutination test for detection of C. neoformans in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from 49 Brazilian suspected meningitis patients. Results were validated with samples obtained from 10 patients negative for cryptococcosis and HIV, and by analysis of standard C. neoformans strains. PRINCIPAL

findingsThe 5.8S DNA-ITS PCR was more sensitive (89-100%) and specific (100%) than the 18S rDNA PCR and conventional tests (India ink staining and latex agglutination) for identification of C. neoformans. While the 18S PCR exhibited a sensitivity (72%) similar to that of the latex agglutination assay in serum samples, it was superior to the latex agglutination assay when testing CSF, with a sensitivity of 84%. However, the latex agglutination was superior to the 18SrDNA PCR in specificity in CSF (92%). The 5.8S DNA-ITS PCR yielded the highest levels of accuracy (96-100%) of any test for detection (serological and mycological) of C. neoformans in both serum and CSF.

conclusionUse of the nested 5.8S PCR was superior to other techniques for the diagnosis of cryptococcosis. The possibility of using serum, a non-invasively collected material, in a targeted 5.8S PCR analysis to identify Cryptococcus spp. is recommended, especially in immunosuppressed patients. Our results indicate that nested 5.8S PCR can increase the diagnostic capability of cryptococcosis, and we suggest its use to monitor patients in the future.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeCryptococcosisCryptococcus neoformansMeningitisMeningitis, CryptococcalCarbonHumansLatex Fixation TestsCarbonchinese ink

Identifiers

PMID36877731
PMCPMC10019727
OpenAlexW4323294247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read125
reference markers read7
identifiers read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.