Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36877728›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

Current evidences of the efficacy of mosquito mass-trapping interventions to reduce Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus populations and Aedes-borne virus transmission.

Ali Jaffal, Johanna Fite, Thierry Baldet, Pascal Delaunay, Frédéric Jourdain, Ronald Mora-Castillo, Marie-Marie Olive, David Roiz

Open access · goldFull text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Effectiveness of Dengue Vector Control: A Meta-Review.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Integrated Control ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ali JaffalFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (Anses), Maisons-Alfort, France.
Johanna FiteFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (Anses), Maisons-Alfort, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8533-7328
Thierry BaldetASTRE (Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risques, Ecosystèmes), CIRAD, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2979-9517
Pascal DelaunayService de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital L'Archet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, UCA, Nice, France.
Frédéric JourdainSanté publique France (French National Public Health Agency), Montpellier, France.
Ronald Mora-CastilloWorld organisation for animal health, Paris, France.
Marie-Marie OliveASTRE (Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risques, Ecosystèmes), CIRAD, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
David RoizMIVEGEC, IRD, CNRS, Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAgence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRUniversity of Kigali · RW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past decades, several viral diseases transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes-dengue, chikungunya, Zika-have spread outside of tropical areas. To limit the transmission of these viruses and preserve human health, the use of mosquito traps has been developed as a complement or alternative to other vector control techniques. The objective of this work was to perform a systematic review of the existing scientific literature to assess the efficacy of interventions based on adult mosquito trap to control Aedes population densities and the diseases they transmit worldwide. METHODS AND

findingsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases. Among the 19 selected papers, lethal ovitraps were used in 16 studies, host-seeking female traps in 3 studies. Furthermore, 16 studies focused on the control of Ae. aegypti. Our review showed great heterogeneity in the indicators used to assess trap efficacy: e.g., the number of host-seeking females, the number of gravid females, the proportion of positive containers, the viral infection rate in female mosquitoes or serological studies in residents. Regardless of the type of studied traps, the results of various studies support the efficacy of mass trapping in combination with classical integrated vector control in reducing Aedes density. More studies with standardized methodology, and indicators are urgently needed to provide more accurate estimates of their efficacy.

conclusionsThis review highlights gaps in the demonstration of the efficacy of mass trapping of mosquitoes in reducing viral transmission and disease. Thus, further large-scale cluster randomized controlled trials conducted in endemic areas and including epidemiological outcomes are needed to establish scientific evidence for the reduction of viral transmission risk by mass trapping targeting gravid and/or host-seeking female mosquitoes.

Indexed as

AedesZika VirusZika Virus InfectionAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMosquito ControlMosquito Vectors

Identifiers

PMID36877728
PMCPMC10032496
OpenAlexW4323294582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read128
table measurements read101
reference markers read20
identifiers read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.