Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36877676›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Human resource time commitments and associated costs of Community Caregiver outreach team operations in South Africa.

Rachel Mukora, Ryan R Thompson, Piotr Hippner, Resignation Pelusa, Martha Mothibi, Richard Lessells, Alison D Grant, Katherine Fielding, Kavindhran Velen, Salome Charalambous and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Social accountability challenges and recommendations by community service rehabilitation therapists.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rachel MukoraThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ryan R ThompsonDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6965-7770
Piotr HippnerThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Resignation PelusaThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Martha MothibiThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Richard LessellsAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Alison D GrantAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Katherine FieldingTB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Kavindhran VelenThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8577-3915
Salome CharalambousThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Johannesburg, South Africa.
David W DowdyDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Hojoon SohnDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_16020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn South Africa, Community Caregivers (CCGs) visit households to provide basic healthcare services including those for tuberculosis and HIV. However, CCG workloads, costs, and time burden are largely unknown. Our objective was to assess the workloads and operational costs for CCG teams operating in different settings in South Africa.

methodsBetween March and October 2018, we collected standardized self-reported activity time forms from 11 CCG pairs working at two public health clinics in Ekurhuleni district, South Africa. CCG workloads were assessed based on activity unit times, per-household visit time, and mean daily number of successful household visits. Using activity-based times and CCG operating cost data, we assessed CCG annual and per-household visit costs (USD 2019) from the health system perspective.

resultsCCGs in clinic 1 (peri-urban, 7 CCG pairs) and 2 (urban, informal settlement; 4 CCG pairs) served an area of 3.1 km2 and 0.6 km2 with 8,035 and 5,200 registered households, respectively. CCG pairs spent a median 236 minutes per day conducting field activities at clinic 1 versus 235 minutes at clinic 2. CCG pairs at clinic 1 spent 49.5% of this time at households (versus traveling), compared to 35.0% at clinic 2. On average, CCG pairs successfully visited 9.5 vs 6.7 households per day for clinics 1 and 2, respectively. At clinic 1, 2.7% of household visits were unsuccessful, versus 28.5% at clinic 2. Total annual operating costs were higher in clinic 1 ($71,780 vs $49,097) but cost per successful visit was lower ($3.58) than clinic 2 ($5.85).

conclusionsCCG home visits were more frequent, successful, and less costly in clinic 1, which served a larger and more formalized settlement. The variability in workload and cost observed across pairs and clinics suggests that circumstantial factors and CCG needs must be carefully assessed for optimized CCG outreach operations.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesCaregiversHouse CallsHumansSouth AfricaWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID36877676
PMCPMC9987772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.