Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36877673›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Development and external validation of machine learning algorithms for postnatal gestational age estimation using clinical data and metabolomic markers.

Steven Hawken, Robin Ducharme, Malia S Q Murphy, Brieanne Olibris, A Brianne Bota, Lindsay A Wilson, Wei Cheng, Julian Little, Beth K Potter, Kathryn M Denize and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Steven HawkenClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3341-9022
Robin DucharmeClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Malia S Q MurphyClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Brieanne OlibrisClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
A Brianne BotaClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lindsay A WilsonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Wei ChengClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1475-4079
Julian LittleSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Beth K PotterSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kathryn M DenizeNewborn Screening Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Monica LamoureuxNewborn Screening Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew HendersonNewborn Screening Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Katelyn J RittenhouseUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Joan T PriceUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Humphrey MwapeUNC Global Projects Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Bellington VwalikaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Patrick MusondaDepartment of Medical Statistics, University of Zambia College of Public Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Jesmin PervinInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-8082-4178
A K Azad ChowdhuryDhaka Shishu (Children) Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Anisur RahmanInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Pranesh ChakrabortyNewborn Screening Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey S A StringerUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9590-7216
Kumanan WilsonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
UJMT – ORWH – Gazzetta, Issa-BoubeD43TW009340 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI William Checkley, Benjamin H. Chi · 2017 to 2026
$14.8M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009340NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate estimates of gestational age (GA) at birth are important for preterm birth surveillance but can be challenging to obtain in low income countries. Our objective was to develop machine learning models to accurately estimate GA shortly after birth using clinical and metabolomic data.

methodsWe derived three GA estimation models using ELASTIC NET multivariable linear regression using metabolomic markers from heel-prick blood samples and clinical data from a retrospective cohort of newborns from Ontario, Canada. We conducted internal model validation in an independent cohort of Ontario newborns, and external validation in heel prick and cord blood sample data collected from newborns from prospective birth cohorts in Lusaka, Zambia and Matlab, Bangladesh. Model performance was measured by comparing model-derived estimates of GA to reference estimates from early pregnancy ultrasound.

resultsSamples were collected from 311 newborns from Zambia and 1176 from Bangladesh. The best-performing model accurately estimated GA within about 6 days of ultrasound estimates in both cohorts when applied to heel prick data (MAE 0.79 weeks (95% CI 0.69, 0.90) for Zambia; 0.81 weeks (0.75, 0.86) for Bangladesh), and within about 7 days when applied to cord blood data (1.02 weeks (0.90, 1.15) for Zambia; 0.95 weeks (0.90, 0.99) for Bangladesh).

conclusionsAlgorithms developed in Canada provided accurate estimates of GA when applied to external cohorts from Zambia and Bangladesh. Model performance was superior in heel prick data as compared to cord blood data.

Indexed as

Ankle InjuriesKnee InjuriesPremature BirthAlgorithmsFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMachine LearningOntarioPregnancyProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesZambia

Identifiers

PMID36877673
PMCPMC9987787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.