Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36877565›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women's Access to and Interest in mHealth: National Web-based Cross-sectional Survey.

Sarah Jane Perkes, Billie Bonevski, Kerry Hall, Joerg Mattes, Catherine Chamberlain, Jessica Bennett, Robyn Whittaker, Kerrin Palazzi, David Lambkin, Michelle Kennedy

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring Self-Report Dietary Assessment Tools Validated for Indigenous Populations Globally: A Scoping Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah Jane Perkes *College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1889-7368
Billie BonevskiCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8505-622X
Kerry HallFirst Peoples Health Unit, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1392-7644
Joerg MattesSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3729-5722
Catherine ChamberlainIndigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3446-0227
Jessica BennettSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4984-9913
Robyn WhittakerNational Institute for Health Innovation, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0901-9149
Kerrin PalazziHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6622-0805
David LambkinHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5729-1927
Michelle KennedySchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9691-068X
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUFlinders University · AUGriffith University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth programs delivered through digital devices such as mobile phones (mobile health [mHealth]) have become an increasingly important component of the health care tool kit. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women of reproductive age are likely to be caring for children and family members and needing health care, but little is known about their access to and interest in mHealth.

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to investigate Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women's ownership of digital devices, access to the internet, current mHealth use, and interest and preferences for future mHealth. We examined the factors (age, remoteness, caring for a child younger than 5 years, and level of education) associated with the ownership of digital devices, use of internet, and interest in using a mobile phone to improve health. This study also examines if women are more likely to use mHealth for topics that they are less confident to talk about face-to-face with a health professional.

methodsA national web-based cross-sectional survey targeting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women of reproductive age (16-49 years) was performed. Descriptive statistics were reported, and logistic regressions were used to examine the associations.

resultsIn total, 379 women completed the survey; 89.2% (338/379) owned a smartphone, 53.5% (203/379) a laptop or home computer, 35.6% (135/379) a tablet, and 93.1% (353/379) had access to the internet at home. Most women used social media (337/379, 88.9%) or the internet (285/379, 75.2%) everyday. The most common modality used on the mobile phone for health was Google (232/379, 61.2%), followed by social media (195/379, 51.5%). The most preferred modality for future programs was SMS text messaging (211/379, 55.7%) and social media (195/379, 51.4%). The most preferred topics for future mHealth programs were healthy eating (210/379, 55.4%) and cultural engagement (205/379, 54.1%). Women who were younger had greater odds of owning a smartphone, and women with tertiary education were more likely to own a tablet or laptop. Older age was associated with interest to use telehealth, and higher educational attainment was associated with interest for videoconferencing. Most women (269/379, 70.9%) used an Aboriginal medical service and overall reported high rates of confidence to discuss health topics with a health professional. Overall, women showed a similar likelihood of selecting a topic in mHealth whether they were or were not confident to talk to a health professional about that.

conclusionsOur study found that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women were avid users of the internet and had strong interest in mHealth. Future mHealth programs for these women should consider utilizing SMS text messaging and social media modalities and including content on nutrition and culture. A noteworthy limitation of this study was that participant recruitment was web-based (due to COVID-19 restrictions).

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityTelemedicineAdolescentAdultAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternetMiddle AgedYoung AdultAboriginalacceptanceadoptionAustraliacross-sectionaldigital devicedigital dividedigital literacyhealth literacymHealthmobile devicenational surveynativepublic healthtechnology ownershiptechnology useTorres Strait Islanderusage

Identifiers

PMID36877565
PMCPMC10028504
OpenAlexW4318658448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read81
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.