Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36877558›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2023

Digital Practices by Citizens During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From an International Multisite Study.

Hannah Ramsden Marston, Pei-Chun Ko, Vishnunarayan Girishan Prabhu, Shannon Freeman, Christopher Ross, Iryna Sharaievska, Matthew Hem Browning, Sarah Earle, Loredana Ivan, Rubal Kanozia and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.

Hannah Ramsden Marston *School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8018-4166
Pei-Chun Ko *School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3375-2183
Vishnunarayan Girishan Prabhu *Systems Engineering & Engineering Management, University of North Carolina, Clemson, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5410-9894
Shannon Freeman *School of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8129-6696
Christopher Ross *School of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3651-0876
Iryna Sharaievska *Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4539-3085
Matthew Hem Browning *Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2296-7602
Sarah Earle *School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2810-5659
Loredana Ivan *Communication Department, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7153-5198
Rubal Kanozia *Department of Mass Communication and Media Studies, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2890-1244
Halime Öztürk Çalıkoğlu *Department of Educational Sciences, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0121-7124
Hasan Arslan *Department of Educational Sciences, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8011-3069
Burcu Bilir-Koca *Department of Educational Sciences, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8292-0358
Paula Alexandra Silva *Department of Informatics Engineering, Center for Informatics and Systems at the University of Coimbra, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1573-7446
Sandra C Buttigieg *Department of Health Systems Management and Leadership, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0572-2462
Franziska Großschädl *Institute of Nursing Science and Age and Care Research Group, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-0443
Gerhilde Schüttengruber *Institute of Nursing Science and Age and Care Research Group, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5051-2803
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi · TRClemson University · USThe Open University · GBUniversity of Northern British Columbia · CACentral University of Punjab · INMonash University · AUNational School of Political Science and Public Administration · ROUniversity of Coimbra · PTUniversity of Malta · MT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic brought digital practices and engagement to the forefront of society, which were based on behavioral changes associated with adhering to different government mandates. Further behavioral changes included transitioning from working in the office to working from home, with the use of various social media and communication platforms to maintain a level of social connectedness, especially given that many people who were living in different types of communities, such as rural, urban, and city spaces, were socially isolated from friends, family members, and community groups. Although there is a growing body of research exploring how technology is being used by people, there is limited information and insight about the digital practices employed across different age cohorts living in different physical spaces and residing in different countries.

objectiveThis paper presents the findings from an international multisite study exploring the impact of social media and the internet on the health and well-being of individuals in different countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsData were collected via a series of online surveys deployed between April 4, 2020, and September 30, 2021. The age of respondents varied from 18 years to over 60 years across the 3 regions of Europe, Asia, and North America. On exploring the associations of technology use, social connectedness, and sociodemographic factors with loneliness and well-being through bivariate and multivariate analyses, significant differences were observed.

resultsThe levels of loneliness were higher among respondents who used social media messengers or many social media apps than among those who did not use social media messengers or used ≤1 social media app. Additionally, the levels of loneliness were higher among respondents who were not members of an online community support group than among those who were members of an online community support group. Psychological well-being was significantly lower and loneliness was significantly higher among people living in small towns and rural areas than among those living in suburban and urban communities. Younger respondents (18-29 years old), single adults, unemployed individuals, and those with lower levels of education were more likely to experience loneliness.

conclusionsFrom an international and interdisciplinary perspective, policymakers and stakeholders should extend and explore interventions targeting loneliness experienced by single young adults and further examine how this may vary across geographies. The study findings have implications across the fields of gerontechnology, health sciences, social sciences, media communication, computers, and information technology. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.3389/fsoc.2020.574811.

Indexed as

communicationcommunity livingCOVID-19gerontologysocial mediatechnology

Identifiers

PMID36877558
PMCPMC9994468
OpenAlexW4323295133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.