ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2023
[Individualized treatment in anesthesiology and intensive care medicine].
Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Individualized medicine in the era of biomarkers and artificial intelligence].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndividualized medicine uses data on biological characteristics of individual patients in order to tailor treatment planning to their unique constitution. With respect to the practice of anesthesiology and intensive care medicine, it bears the potential to systematize the often complex medical care of critically ill patients and to improve outcomes.
objectiveThe aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the possible applications of the principles of individualized medicine in anesthesiology and intensive care medicine. MATERIAL AND
methodsBased on a search in MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Google Scholar, the results of previous studies and systematic reviews are narratively synthesized and the implications for the scientific and clinical practice are presented. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: There are possibilities for individualization and an increase in precision of patient care in most if not all problems in anesthesiology and symptoms in intensive medical care. Even now, all practicing physicians can initiate measures to individualize treatment at different timepoints throughout the course of treatment. Individualized medicine can supplement and be integrated into protocols. Plans for future applications of individualized medicine interventions should consider the feasibility in a real-world setting. Clinical studies should contain process evaluations in order to create ideal preconditions for a successful implementation. Quality management, audits and feedback should become a standard procedure to ensure sustainability. In the long run, individualization of care, especially in the critically ill, should be enshrined in guidelines and become an integral part of clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.