ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[The interoperability of IIEF-5 with EPIC-26 : Sexual function after radical prostatectomy].
Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the past, the IIEF‑5 (International Index of Erectile Function 5 ) was predominantly used to measure erectile function in prostate cancer patients. Following international developments, the domain "sexuality" of the EPIC-26 (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26) is increasingly used in Germany.
objectiveThe aim of this work is to create a practicable comparison of the domain "sexuality" of the EPIC-26 with the IIEF‑5 for treatment in Germany. This is particularly necessary for the evaluation of historical patient collectives. MATERIALS AND
methodsFor the evaluation, 2123 patients with prostate cancer confirmed by biopsy from 2014-2017 who completed both the IIEF‑5 and the EPIC-26 were considered. Linear regression analyses are calculated to convert IIEF‑5 sum scores to EPIC-26 sexuality domain scores.
resultsThe correlation between IIEF‑5 and the EPIC-26 domain score "sexuality" was 0.74, suggesting a high degree of content convergence between the constructs measured. While the standard error of the predicted values is relatively small, the prediction intervals are very wide. For example, for the critical IIEF‑5 value of 22, the predicted value is 78.88 with a 95% prediction interval of 55.09 to 102.66.
conclusionIIEF‑5 and the Sexuality scale of the EPIC-26 measure a similar construct. The analysis shows that conversion of individual values is associated with great uncertainty. However, at the group level, the observed EPIC-26 "sexuality" score could be predicted quite accurately. This opens up the possibility of comparing the erectile function of cohorts of patients/test persons, even if this was collected with different measuring instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36877230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.