Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36877192›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2023

Factors Predicting the Extent to which STEM Students Value Cross-Disciplinary Skills: A Study across Four Institutions.

Lindsay B Wheeler, Katerina V Thompson, Gili Marbach-Ad, Patrick Sheehan, Jacqueline L Bortiatynski, Cindy Ghent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lindsay B WheelerCenter for Teaching Excellence, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904.
Katerina V ThompsonCollege of Computer, Mathematical, and Natural Sciences Teaching and Learning Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Gili Marbach-AdCollege of Computer, Mathematical, and Natural Sciences Teaching and Learning Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Patrick SheehanCollege of Computer, Mathematical, and Natural Sciences Teaching and Learning Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Jacqueline L BortiatynskiCenter for Excellence in Science Education, Penn State University, State College, PA 16802.
Cindy GhentSTEM Education Center, Fisher College of Science and Mathematics, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expectancy-value theory of motivation (EVT) suggests that student values influence their likelihood of putting in the effort required to learn, and these values can be shaped by student characteristics, such as their experiences, sociodemographics, and disciplinary norms. To understand the extent to which these characteristics relate to students' values, we surveyed 1162 graduating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students across four universities using the previously developed and validated Survey of Teaching Beliefs and Practices for Undergraduates (STEP-U). The STEP-U survey included Likert questions to capture students' values of 27 cross-disciplinary skills and the frequency with which they experienced 27 instructional methods thought to develop particular skills. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) showed an understandable factor structure for both students' perceived value of cross-disciplinary skills and frequency of classroom experiences. Using multiple regression, we identified differences in values that were associated with classroom experiences, STEM discipline, participation in undergraduate research, and student sociodemographics. Findings were generalizable across institutions and disciplines. The theoretical framework (EVT), the broad data collection (four institutions with multiple disciplines), and the type of data analyses (e.g., EFA) used provide theoretical, methodological, and practical contributions and suggest additional directions for future research.

Indexed as

EngineeringStudentsData AnalysisData CollectionHumansTechnology

Identifiers

PMID36877192
PMCPMC10228268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.