Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36877155›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2023

A Simple Method for Quantifying Blastema Growth in Regenerating Planarians.

Natali Campillo, Danielle Ireland, Yashvi Patel, Eva-Maria S Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natali CampilloDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania.
Danielle IrelandDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania.
Yashvi PatelDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania.
Eva-Maria S CollinsDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Trevor M Penning · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
Comparative mechanistic study of developmental neurotoxicity of organophosphorus pesticidesR15ES031354 · NIEHS · SWARTHMORE COLLEGE · PI COLLINS, EVA-MARIA SCHOETZ · 2020 to 2023
$764k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508NIEHS NIH HHS R15 ES031354NIH HHS R15ES031354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their strong regenerative capabilities, freshwater planarians are a well-suited model system for studying the effects of chemicals on stem cell biology and regeneration. After amputation, a planarian will regenerate the missing body parts within 1 to 2 weeks. Because planarians have a distinct head morphology that can be easily identified, head and eye regeneration has been a popular qualitative measure of toxicity. However, qualitative measures can only detect strong defects. Here, we present protocols for quantifying the rate of blastema growth to measure regeneration defects for assessment of chemical toxicity. Following amputation, a regenerative blastema forms at the wound site. Over the course of several days, the blastema grows and subsequently re-forms the missing anatomical structures. This growth can be measured by imaging the regenerating planarian. As the blastema tissue is unpigmented, it can be easily distinguished from the remaining pigmented body using standard image analysis techniques. Basic Protocol 1 provides a step-by-step guide for imaging regenerating planarians over several days of regeneration. Basic Protocol 2 describes the necessary steps for the quantification of blastema size using freeware. It is accompanied by video tutorials to facilitate adaptation. Basic Protocol 3 shows how to calculate the growth rate using linear curve fitting in a spreadsheet. The ease of implementation and low cost make this procedure suitable for an undergraduate laboratory teaching setting, in addition to typical research settings. Although we focus on head regeneration in Dugesia japonica, these protocols are adaptable to other wound sites and planarian species. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Imaging planarians during regeneration Basic Protocol 2: Quantitative analysis of blastema size with ImageJ Basic Protocol 3: Quantification of blastema growth rate.

Indexed as

PlanariansAcclimatizationAmputation, SurgicalAnimalsNerve RegenerationblastemaDugesia japonicaflatwormgrowth rateimage analysismorphologyregeneration

Identifiers

PMID36877155
PMCPMC10558012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.