Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36877139›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023

KomaMRI.jl: An open-source framework for general MRI simulations with GPU acceleration.

Carlos Castillo-Passi, Ronal Coronado, Gabriel Varela-Mattatall, Carlos Alberola-López, René Botnar, Pablo Irarrazaval

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fast MR Simulation Using Combined Update of Grouped Isochromats.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlos Castillo-PassiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6227-0477
Ronal CoronadoInstitute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6735-2607
Gabriel Varela-MattatallCentre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping (CFMM), Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6101-7218
Carlos Alberola-LópezLaboratorio de Procesado de Imagen, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3684-0055
René BotnarSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2811-2509
Pablo IrarrazavalInstitute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-5186-2642

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust NS/A000049/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop an open-source, high-performance, easy-to-use, extensible, cross-platform, and general MRI simulation framework (Koma).

methodsKoma was developed using the Julia programming language. Like other MRI simulators, it solves the Bloch equations with CPU and GPU parallelization. The inputs are the scanner parameters, the phantom, and the pulse sequence that is Pulseq-compatible. The raw data is stored in the ISMRMRD format. For the reconstruction, MRIReco.jl is used. A graphical user interface utilizing web technologies was also designed. Two types of experiments were performed: one to compare the quality of the results and the execution speed, and the second to compare its usability. Finally, the use of Koma in quantitative imaging was demonstrated by simulating Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) acquisitions.

resultsKoma was compared to two well-known open-source MRI simulators, JEMRIS and MRiLab. Highly accurate results (with mean absolute differences below 0.1% compared to JEMRIS) and better GPU performance than MRiLab were demonstrated. In an experiment with students, Koma was proved to be easy to use, eight times faster on personal computers than JEMRIS, and 65% of test subjects recommended it. The potential for designing acquisition and reconstruction techniques was also shown through the simulation of MRF acquisitions, with conclusions that agree with the literature.

conclusionsKoma's speed and flexibility have the potential to make simulations more accessible for education and research. Koma is expected to be used for designing and testing novel pulse sequences before implementing them in the scanner with Pulseq files, and for creating synthetic data to train machine learning models.

Indexed as

LanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingAccelerationComputer SimulationHumansPhantoms, ImagingBloch equationsGPUGUIJuliaopen sourcesimulation

Identifiers

PMID36877139
PMCPMC10952765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.