ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2023
Determining the Delamanid Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Susceptibility Breakpoint Using Monte Carlo Experiments.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imipenem Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics in Preclinical Hollow Fiber Model, Dose Finding in Virtual Patients, and Clinical Evidence of Efficacy for Mycobacterium abscessus Lung Disease.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Tigecycline pharmacodynamics in the hollow fiber system ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Pharmacology of emerging drugs for the treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, based on clinical breakpoints that incorporate pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) and clinical outcomes, is becoming a new standard in guiding individual patient therapy as well as for drug resistance surveillance. However, for most antituberculosis drugs, breakpoints are instead defined by the epidemiological cutoff values of the MIC of phenotypically wild-type strains irrespective of PK/PD or dose. In this study, we determined the PK/PD breakpoint for delamanid by estimating the probability of target attainment for the approved dose administered at 100 mg twice daily using Monte Carlo experiments. We used the PK/PD targets (0- to 24-h area under the concentration-time curve to MIC) identified in a murine chronic tuberculosis model, hollow fiber system model of tuberculosis, early bactericidal activity studies of patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis, and population pharmacokinetics in patients with tuberculosis. At the MIC of 0.016 mg/L, determined using Middlebrook 7H11 agar, the probability of target attainment was 100% in the 10,000 simulated subjects. The probability of target attainment fell to 25%, 40%, and 68% for PK/PD targets derived from the mouse model, the hollow fiber system model of tuberculosis, and patients, respectively, at the MIC of 0.031 mg/L. This indicates that an MIC of 0.016 mg/L is the delamanid PK/PD breakpoint for delamanid at 100 mg twice daily. Our study demonstrated that it is feasible to use PK/PD approaches to define a breakpoint for an antituberculosis drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.