ArticlemBio2023
Enterovirus D-68 Infection of Primary Rat Cortical Neurons: Entry, Replication, and Functional Consequences.
Article in mBio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Decoding the complex receptor landscape of enterovirus D68.PLoS pathogens · 2026Review
- Non-polio enterovirus infection and electrophysiological changes in human iPSC-derived neural networks.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Non-polio enteroviruses compromise the electrophysiology of a human iPSC-derived neural network.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Immune cells promote paralytic disease in mice infected with enterovirus D68.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- Ex vivo study of neuroinvasive and neurotropic viruses: what is current and what is next.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Antiviral immunity within neural stem cells distinguishes Enterovirus-D68 strain differences in forebrain organoids.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2024Article
- Understanding the Neurotrophic Virus Mechanisms and Their Potential Effect on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Development.Brain sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is an emerging pathogen associated with mild to severe respiratory disease. Since 2014, EV-D68 is also linked to acute flaccid myelitis (AFM), causing paralysis and muscle weakness in children. However, it remains unclear whether this is due to an increased pathogenicity of contemporary EV-D68 clades or increased awareness and detection of this virus. Here, we describe an infection model of primary rat cortical neurons to study the entry, replication, and functional consequences of different EV-D68 strains, including historical and contemporary strains. We demonstrate that sialic acids are important (co)receptors for infection of both neurons and respiratory epithelial cells. Using a collection of glycoengineered isogenic HEK293 cell lines, we show that sialic acids on either N-glycans or glycosphingolipids can be used for infection. Additionally, we show that both excitatory glutamatergic and inhibitory GABA-ergic neurons are susceptible and permissive to historical and contemporary EV-D68 strains. EV-D68 infection of neurons leads to the reorganization of the Golgi-endomembranes forming replication organelles, first in the soma and later in the processes. Finally, we demonstrate that the spontaneous neuronal activity of EV-D68-infected neuronal network cultured on microelectrode arrays (MEA) is decreased, independent of the virus strain. Collectively, our findings provide novel insights into neurotropism and -pathology of different EV-D68 strains, and argue that it is unlikely that increased neurotropism is a recently acquired phenotype of a specific genetic lineage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.