Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36876883›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2023

A synthetic data integration framework to leverage external summary-level information from heterogeneous populations.

Tian Gu, Jeremy Michael George Taylor, Bhramar Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tian GuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0856-8843
Jeremy Michael George TaylorDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Bhramar MukherjeeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Eric R. Fearon · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Modeling Precision Interventions for Prostate Cancer ControlU01CA253915 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ETZIONI, RUTH D, TSODIKOV, ALEXANDER · 2020 to 2025
$6.5M
MI-CARES: The Michigan Cancer and Research on the Environment StudyUH3CA267907 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy, Bhramar Mukherjee · 2024 to 2026
$6.0M
Statistical Methods for Cancer BiomarkersR01CA129102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GHOSH, DEBASHIS, TAYLOR, JEREMY M.G. · 2009 to 2021
$3.3M
MI-CARES: The Michigan Cancer and Research on the Environment StudyUG3CA267907 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DOLINOY, DANA, MUKHERJEE, BHRAMAR · 2021 to 2022
$2.2M
Statistical and computational methods for rare variant association analysisR01HG008773 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MUKHERJEE, BHRAMAR · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129102NCI NIH HHS U01 CA253915NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA267907NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA267907NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008773NIH HHS 1UG3CA267907-01NIH HHS 5P30CA046592-30NIH HHS CA129102NIH HHS R01HG008773-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing need for flexible general frameworks that integrate individual-level data with external summary information for improved statistical inference. External information relevant for a risk prediction model may come in multiple forms, through regression coefficient estimates or predicted values of the outcome variable. Different external models may use different sets of predictors and the algorithm they used to predict the outcome Y given these predictors may or may not be known. The underlying populations corresponding to each external model may be different from each other and from the internal study population. Motivated by a prostate cancer risk prediction problem where novel biomarkers are measured only in the internal study, this paper proposes an imputation-based methodology, where the goal is to fit a target regression model with all available predictors in the internal study while utilizing summary information from external models that may have used only a subset of the predictors. The method allows for heterogeneity of covariate effects across the external populations. The proposed approach generates synthetic outcome data in each external population, uses stacked multiple imputation to create a long dataset with complete covariate information. The final analysis of the stacked imputed data is conducted by weighted regression. This flexible and unified approach can improve statistical efficiency of the estimated coefficients in the internal study, improve predictions by utilizing even partial information available from models that use a subset of the full set of covariates used in the internal study, and provide statistical inference for the external population with potentially different covariate effects from the internal population.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, StatisticalBiomarkersHumansMaleBiomarkersdata integrationprediction modelsstacked multiple imputationsynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID36876883
PMCPMC10480346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.