Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36876463›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2023

Effectiveness of online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic on practical manual therapy skills of undergraduate physiotherapy students.

Kerstin Luedtke, Luisa Luebke, Ignacio Elizagaray-Garcia, Oskar Schindler, Tibor M Szikszay

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kerstin LuedtkeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research, Universität zu Lübeck, Institute of Health Sciences, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7308-5469
Luisa LuebkeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research, Universität zu Lübeck, Institute of Health Sciences, Lübeck, Germany.
Ignacio Elizagaray-GarciaDepartamento de Fisioterapia. Centro Superiorde Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Oskar SchindlerDepartment of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research, Universität zu Lübeck, Institute of Health Sciences, Lübeck, Germany.
Tibor M SzikszayDepartment of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research, Universität zu Lübeck, Institute of Health Sciences, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study includes two separate parts: the objective for part A was to evaluate the practical manual therapy skills of undergraduate physiotherapy students who had learned manual therapy techniques either online or in classroom depending on the phases of the pandemic. The objective for part B was to evaluate in a randomized prospective design the effectiveness of video-based versus traditional teaching of a manual therapy technique.

designCross-sectional cohort study (part A) and randomized controlled trial (part B).

settingUniversity of Luebeck, undergraduate physiotherapy students in years 1-3.

methodIn part A, physiotherapy students who had learned manual therapy either online (during the pandemic) or in classroom (prior to and after the lock down periods of the pandemic) were videotaped while performing two manual techniques on the knee joint and on the lumbar spine. Recordings were analyzed independently by two blinded raters according to a 10-item list of criteria. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's kappa for each item. Performance across cohorts was analyzed using analysis of variance. In part B, students were randomized to learn a new technique on the cervical spine either from a lecturer or from the same lecturer on a video recording (independent variable). Practical performance of the technique was analyzed by two raters blinded to group allocation according to a 10-item list of criteria (dependent variable). Results were analyzed statistically by using ANCOVA with year of study as a covariate.

resultsSixty-three and 56 students participated in part A and part B of the study, respectively. The inter-rater reliability for video analyses for both parts of the study was moderate (k = 0.402 to 0.441). In part A, there was no statistically significant difference across years of study for the practical performance of the technique on the back F(2,59) = 2.271;

conclusionPractical skill performance can be acquired from videos but immediate skill reproduction is significantly better when the technique is presented by a lecturer in classroom and practiced on peer students.

Indexed as

COVID-19Musculoskeletal ManipulationsCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesReproducibility of ResultsStudentsdigital educationdistance educationentry-level physiotherapyremote educationSars-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36876463
PMCPMC10566393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.