Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36876330›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials science2023

Controlled degradation of polycaprolactone-based micropillar arrays.

Niamh Geoghegan, Mark O'Loughlin, Colm Delaney, Keith D Rochfort, Meabh Kennedy, Srikanth Kolagatla, Lucia Podhorska, Brian J Rodriguez, Larisa Florea, Susan M Kelleher

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Niamh GeogheganSchool of Chemistry, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. susan.kelleher@dcu.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8576-6248
Mark O'LoughlinSchool of Chemistry, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. susan.kelleher@dcu.ie.
Colm DelaneySchool of Chemistry and AMBER, the SFI Research Centre for Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4397-0133
Keith D RochfortSchool of Nursing, Psychotherapy, and Community Health, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Meabh KennedySchool of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Srikanth KolagatlaSchool of Chemistry and AMBER, the SFI Research Centre for Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Lucia PodhorskaSchool of Chemistry, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. susan.kelleher@dcu.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9097-6191
Brian J RodriguezConway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-2717
Larisa FloreaSchool of Chemistry and AMBER, the SFI Research Centre for Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-2393
Susan M KelleherSchool of Chemistry, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. susan.kelleher@dcu.ie.
University College Dublin · IEDublin City University · IETrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein we demonstrate the fabrication of arrays of micropillars, achieved through the combination of direct laser writing and nanoimprint lithography. By combining two diacrylate monomers, polycaprolactone dimethacrylate (PCLDMA) and 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate (HDDA), two copolymer formulations that, owing to the varying ratios of the hydrolysable ester functionalities present in the polycaprolactone moiety, can be degraded in the presence of base in a controllable manner. As such, the degradation of the micropillars can be tuned over several days as a function of PCLDMA concentration within the copolymer formulations, and the topography greatly varied over a short space of time, as visualised using scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. Crosslinked neat HDDA was used as a control material, demonstrating that the presence of the PCL was responsible for the ability of the microstructures to degrade in the controlled manner. In addition, the mass loss of the crosslinked materials was minimal, demonstrating the degradation of microstructured surfaces without loss of bulk properties was possible. Moreover, the compatibility of these crosslinked materials with mammalian cells was explored. The influence of both indirect and direct contact of the materials with A549 cells was assessed by profiling indices reflective of cytotoxicity such as morphology, adhesion, metabolic activity, oxidative balance, and release of injury markers. No significant changes in the aforementioned profile were observed in the cells cultured under these conditions for up to 72 h, with the cell-material interaction suggesting these materials may have potential in microfabrication contexts towards biomedical application purposes.

Indexed as

PolyestersPolymersAnimalsCell CommunicationMammalspolycaprolactonePolyestersPolymers

Identifiers

PMID36876330
PMCPMC10152922
OpenAlexW4321795898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.