Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36876246›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2023

Telehealth reform post-public health emergency: crucial next steps.

Devon Thomas, David Garate, Shangyi Fu, Amna Bashir, Nathaniel Moss, Muktha Nair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Devon ThomasJohn Sealy School of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4269-2925
David GarateJohn Sealy School of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Shangyi FuSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Amna BashirSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Nathaniel MossSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Muktha NairSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the pandemic made it unsafe for providers and patients to meet in person, the US government implemented key temporary telehealth waivers in March 2020 that expanded Medicare telehealth coverage dramatically. Some of the most significant changes included the removal of location restrictions so that patients and providers could engage in telehealth from their homes, full provider reimbursement for telehealth visits, coverage for more medical specialties and types of practitioners such as occupational and physical therapists, and the allowance of telehealth prescription of controlled substances. The waivers will end when the government removes the federal status of a public health emergency, which is expected to occur in 2023. Nearly 64 million Medicare patients are at risk of losing most modalities of telehealth access. We present current legislation that could combat this "telehealth cliff" and defend the position that Medicare telehealth access should remain permanently expanded.

Indexed as

Lawtelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36876246
PMCPMC9980665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.