Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36875894›Full record

ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2023

Cardiac Toxicity of Alectinib in Patients With ALK+ Lung Cancer: Outcomes of Cardio-Oncology Follow-Up.

Melinda A Pruis, G D Marijn Veerman, H Carlijne Hassing, Daan A C Lanser, Marthe S Paats, Ron H N van Schaik, Ron H J Mathijssen, Olivier Manintveld, Anne-Marie C Dingemans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Endothelium as a Source of Cardiovascular Toxicity From Antitumor Kinase Inhibitors.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melinda A PruisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
G D Marijn VeermanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
H Carlijne HassingDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Daan A C LanserDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marthe S PaatsDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ron H N van SchaikDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Olivier ManintveldDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Anne-Marie C DingemansDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (3% to 7%) predict for response to ALK-inhibitors (eg, alectinib, first line), resulting in a 5-year survival rate of ∼60% and median progression-free survival of 34.8 months. Although the overall toxicity rate of alectinib is acceptable, unexplained adverse events, including edema and bradycardia, may indicate potential cardiac toxicity. Objectives: This study's aim was to investigate the cardiotoxicity profile and exposure-toxicity relationship of alectinib. Methods: Between April 2020 and September 2021, 53 patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with alectinib were included. Patients starting with alectinib after April 2020 underwent a cardiac work-up at start, at 6 months and at 1 year at the cardio-oncology outpatients' clinic. Patients already receiving alectinib >6 months underwent 1 cardiac evaluation. Bradycardia, edema, and severe alectinib toxicity (grade ≥3 and grade ≥2 adverse events leading to dose modifications) data were collected. Alectinib steady-state trough concentrations were used for exposure-toxicity analyses. Results: Left ventricular ejection fraction remained stable in all patients who underwent an on-treatment cardiac evaluation (n = 34; median 62%; IQR: 58%-64%). Twenty-two patients (42%) developed alectinib-related bradycardia (6 symptomatic bradycardia). One patient underwent a pacemaker implantation for severe symptomatic bradycardia. Severe toxicity was significantly associated with a 35% higher alectinib mean C Conclusions: No patients showed signs of a diminished left ventricular ejection fraction. Alectinib caused more bradycardia than previously reported (42%) with some instances of severe symptomatic bradycardia. Patients with severe toxicity generally had an elevated exposure above the therapeutic threshold.

Indexed as

AE, adverse eventalectinibALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinaseanaplastic lymphoma kinasebradycardiacardio-oncologyCV, cardiovascularECG, electrocardiogramIVC, inferior vena cavaLVEF, left ventricular ejection fractionMET, mesenchymal epithelial transitionnon-small cell lung cancerNSCLC, non-small cell lung cancerOV, outpatient visitPK, pharmacokineticTKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID36875894
PMCPMC9982223
OpenAlexW4316881699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.