Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36875805›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2023

The shadows of waiting and care: on discourses of waiting in the history of the British National Health Service.

Shaul Bar-Haim, Lisa Baraitser, Martin D Moore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shaul Bar-HaimDepartment of Sociology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Lisa BaraitserPsychosocial Studies, Birkbeck University of London, London, London, WC1N 7HX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6209-7838
Martin D MooreWellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1969-0083
Birkbeck, University of London · GBUniversity of Essex · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 205400/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waiting is at the centre of experiences and practices of healthcare. However, we know very little about the relationship between the subjective experiences of patients who wait in and for care, health practitioners who 'prescribe' and manage waiting, and how this relates to broader cultural meanings of waiting. Waiting features heavily in the sociological, managerial, historical and health economics literatures that investigate UK healthcare, but the focus has been on service provision and quality, with waiting (including waiting lists and waiting times) drawn on as a key marker to test the efficiency and affordability of the NHS. In this article, we consider the historical contours of this framing of waiting, and ask what has been lost or occluded through its development. To do so, we review the available discourses in the existing literature on the NHS through a series of 'snapshots' or key moments in its history. Through its negative imprint, we argue that what shadows these discourses is the idea of waiting and care as phenomenological temporal experiences, and time as a practice of care. In response, we begin to trace the intellectual and historical resources available for alternative histories of waiting - materials that might enable scholars to reconstruct some of the complex temporalities of care marginalized in existing accounts of waiting, and which could help reframe both future historical accounts and contemporary debates about waiting in the NHS.

Indexed as

HealthcareHealth EconomicsNHS HistoriographyWaitingWaiting ListsWaiting Times

Identifiers

PMID36875805
PMCPMC9978246
OpenAlexW4320489865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.