Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36875776›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. B2021

Onsager-Casimir frustration from resistance anisotropy in graphene quantum Hall devices.

I-Fan Hu, Alireza R Panna, Albert F Rigosi, Mattias Kruskopf, Dinesh K Patel, Chieh-I Liu, Dipanjan Saha, Shamith U Payagala, David B Newell, Dean G Jarrett and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

I-Fan HuPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA.
Alireza R PannaPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA.
Albert F RigosiPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA.
Mattias KruskopfPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany.
Dinesh K PatelPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA.
Chieh-I LiuPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA.
Dipanjan SahaPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA.
Shamith U PayagalaPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA.
David B NewellPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA.
Dean G JarrettPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA.
Chi-Te LiangDepartment of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Randolph E ElmquistPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report on nonreciprocity observations in several configurations of graphene-based quantum Hall devices. Two distinct measurement configurations were adopted to verify the universality of the observations (i.e., two-terminal arrays and four-terminal devices). Our findings determine the extent to which epitaxial graphene anisotropies contribute to the observed asymmetric Hall responses. The presence of backscattering induces a device-dependent asymmetry rendering the Onsager-Casimir relations limited in their capacity to describe the behavior of such devices, except in the low-field classical regime and the fully quantized Hall state. The improved understanding of this quantum electrical process broadly limits the applicability of the reciprocity principle in the presence of quantum phase transitions and for anisotropic two-dimensional materials.

Identifiers

PMID36875776
PMCPMC9982844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.