ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2023
Neonatal Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The intelligent neonatal healthcare: a systematic review of machine learning architectures integrating the internet of medical things and blockchain.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Culture-Confirmed Neonatal Sepsis in a Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Machine learning models for predicting neonatal bacterial infections: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prognostic modeling of early clinical outcomes in very low birth weight infants: insights from a nationwide cohort on delivery room resuscitation, prematurity-related complications, and mortality.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Optimized ensemble learning framework for neonatal asphyxia prediction using perinatal clinical features.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Machine learning for predicting clinical outcomes of hospitalised children: a systematic review of applications in low- and middle-income countries.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Data science and artificial intelligence for maternal, newborn and child health: scoping review and thematic analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for the needed level of care in preterm neonates.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Comprehensive Review on Toll-like Receptor 4-Mediated Pathophysiology, Clinical, and Therapeutic Insights.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Precision Medicine in Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Neonatal Sepsis: A State-of-the-Art Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development and validation of machine learning models based on stacked generalization to predict psychosocial maladjustment in patients with acute myocardial infarction.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- A Predictive Model for Perinatal Brain Injury Using Machine Learning Based on Early Birth Data.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- AI Algorithms for Modeling the Risk, Progression, and Treatment of Sepsis, Including Early-Onset Sepsis-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Neonatal Infectious Disease: A Major Contributor to Infant Mortality Requiring Advances in Point-of-Care Diagnosis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Development and validation of a diagnostic model to differentiate spinal tuberculosis from pyogenic spondylitis by combining multiple machine learning algorithms.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2024Article
- Predictive analytics in smart healthcare for child mortality prediction using a machine learning approach.Open life sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal diseases are among the main causes of morbidity and a significant contributor to underfive mortality in the world. There is an increase in understanding of the pathophysiology of the diseases and the implementation of different strategies to minimize their burden. However, improvements in outcomes are not adequate. Limited success is due to different factors, including the similarity of symptoms, which can lead to misdiagnosis, and the inability to detect early for timely intervention. In resource-limited countries like Ethiopia, the challenge is more severe. Low access to diagnosis and treatment due to the inadequacy of neonatal health professionals is one of the shortcomings. Due to the shortage of medical facilities, many neonatal health professionals are forced to decide the type of disease only based on interviews. They may not have a complete picture of all variables that have a contributing effect on neonatal disease from the interview. This can make the diagnosis inconclusive and may lead to a misdiagnosis. Machine learning has great potential for early prediction if relevant historical data is available. We have applied a classification stacking model for the following four main neonatal diseases: sepsis, birth asphyxia, necrotizing enter colitis (NEC), and respiratory distress syndrome. These diseases account for 75% of neonatal deaths. The dataset has been obtained from the Asella Comprehensive Hospital. It has been collected between 2018 and 2021. The developed stacking model was compared to three related machine-learning models XGBoost (XGB), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The proposed stacking model outperformed the other models, with an accuracy of 97.04%. We believe that this will contribute to the early detection and accurate diagnosis of neonatal diseases, especially for resource-limited health facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.