Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36875669›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Effects of percutaneously-implanted epidural stimulation on cardiovascular autonomic function and spasticity after complete spinal cord injury: A case report.

Ashraf S Gorgey, Jacob Goldsmith, Ahmad Alazzam, Robert Trainer

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04241250 phase2completednot on this map

Transspinal Versus Epidural Stimulation for Exoskeletal Assisted Walking After Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2020 to 2024Enrolled4ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuryArmsEAW+SCES (exoskelton and spinal cord epidural stimulation), EAW+TS (exoskelton and transspinal stimulation)
NCT04782947 phase2 / phase3recruitingnot on this map

Epidural Stimulation and Resistance Training for Overground Locomotion After Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnited States Department of DefenseRan2021 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsExoskeletal assisted walking, Epidural Stimulation, Resistance Training, delayed-ES, no-Resistance training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Activity of spinal RORβ neurons is related to functional improvements following combination treatment after complete SCI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Synergistic implications of combinatorial rehabilitation approaches using spinal stimulation on therapeutic outcomes in spinal cord injury.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashraf S GorgeySpinal Cord Injury and Disorders Center, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States.
Jacob GoldsmithSpinal Cord Injury and Disorders Center, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States.
Ahmad AlazzamSpinal Cord Injury and Disorders Center, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States.
Robert TrainerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Transspinal versus Epidural Stimulation for Exoskeletal Assisted Walking after Spinal Cord InjuryI21RX003456 · VA · VA VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HOSPITAL · PI GORGEY, ASHRAF · 2020 to 2022
–
RRD VA I21 RX003456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is a revived interest to explore spinal cord epidural stimulation (SCES) to improve physical function after spinal cord injury (SCI). This case report highlights the potential of eliciting multiple functional improvements with a single SCES configuration, a strategy which could improve clinical translation. Objective: To determine whether SCES intended to facilitate walking also acutely yields benefits in cardiovascular autonomic regulation and spasticity. Design: Case report from data collected at two timepoints 15 weeks apart from March to June 2022 as part of a larger clinical trial. Setting: Research lab at Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center. Participant: 27-year-old male, 7 years post a C8 motor complete spinal cord injury. Intervention: A SCES configuration intended to enhance exoskeleton-assisted walking training applied for autonomic and spasticity management. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was cardiovascular autonomic response to a 45-degree head-up-tilt test. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), and absolute power of the low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components of a heart-rate variability analysis were collected in supine and tilt with and without the presence of SCES. Right knee flexor and knee extensor spasticity was assessed Results: At both assessments with SCES off, transitioning from supine to tilt decreased SBP (assessment one: 101.8 to 70 mmHg; assessment two: 98.9 to 66.4 mmHg). At assessment one, SCES on in supine (3 mA) increased SBP (average 117 mmHg); in tilt, 5 mA stabilized SBP near baseline values (average 111.5 mmHg). At assessment two, SCES on in supine (3 mA) increased SBP (average 140 mmHg in minute one); decreasing amplitude to 2 mA decreased SBP (average 119 mmHg in minute five). In tilt, 3 mA stabilized SBP near baseline values (average 93.2 mmHg). Torque-time integrals at the right knee were reduced at all angular velocities for knee flexors (range: -1.9 to -7.8%) and knee extensors (range: -1 to -11.4%). Conclusions and relevance: These results demonstrate that SCES intended to facilitate walking may also enhance cardiovascular autonomic control and attenuate spasticity. Using one configuration to enhance multiple functions after SCI may accelerate clinical translation. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/, identifier NCT04782947.

Indexed as

autonomic nervous systemexoskeletonpercutaneous epidural stimulationrehabilitationspasticityspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID36875669
PMCPMC9978801
OpenAlexW4321109650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.