Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36875540›Full record

ArticleFood control2023

Proficiency of European GMO control laboratories to quantify MON89788 soybean in a meat pâté matrix.

W Broothaerts, R Beaz Hidalgo, G Buttinger, J Seghers, M Maretti, P Robouch, P Corbisier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

W BroothaertsEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Geel, Belgium.
R Beaz HidalgoEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Geel, Belgium.
G ButtingerEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Geel, Belgium.
J SeghersEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Geel, Belgium.
M MarettiEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
P RobouchEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Geel, Belgium.
P CorbisierEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Geel, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GMO control laboratories in the EU routinely monitor the presence and content of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food and feed products collected from the EU market. As the vast majority of GMOs comprize genetically modified plants, most control samples have a plant-based origin. For the first time, a pilot proficiency test was organised requiring the analysis of GMOs in a meat matrix. Meat pâté, a product in which soybean is occasionally identified, was spiked with GM soybean event MON89788, homogenised by mixing, aliquoted in sachets and frozen. The assigned value was determined by two independent expert laboratories. Several DNA extraction methods were tested and proved to be insufficient for the removal of PCR inhibitors present in the DNA extracts, resulting in a GM content underestimated by at least 30%. This problem was solved either by using hot-start qPCR chemistry or by applying the same method in a digital PCR format. A total of 52 laboratories participated in the study. They were requested to verify the presence of any GM soybean in the test item and to quantify the GM event(s) identified by their method of choice. All but one laboratory identified the MON89788 soybean event present in the pâté matrix. The majority of the quantitative results reported were below the assigned value, but did not deviate more than 50% from it. This study demonstrated the proficiency of most GMO control laboratories for the analysis of GMOs in a meat-based product. It also shows that method optimisation for GMO analysis in meat products is nevertheless advisable.

Indexed as

Droplet digital PCRGenetically modified organism (GMO)Hot-start PCRMeatPCR inhibitionProficiency test

Identifiers

PMID36875540
PMCPMC9733489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.