Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36875361›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Prevalence of self-medication and associated factors among female students of health science colleges at Majmaah University: A cross-sectional study.

Shamshad Begum Loni, Raed Eid Alzahrani, Mansour Alzahrani, Mohammad Owais Khan, Rafia Khatoon, Huda Hakim Abdelrahman, Zeinab A Abd-Elhaleem, Munira Mohammed Alhaidari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shamshad Begum LoniDepartment of Basic Medical Science, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Raed Eid AlzahraniDepartment of Basic Medical Science, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Mansour AlzahraniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Owais KhanDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, Shri Devi Institute of Technology, Mangalore, India.
Rafia KhatoonDepartment of Basic Medical Science, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Huda Hakim AbdelrahmanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Zeinab A Abd-ElhaleemDepartment of Basic Medical Science, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Munira Mohammed AlhaidariCollege of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Majmaah University · SAAin Shams University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Globally, the prevalence of self-medication among young people has increased exponentially. Due to the basic knowledge and easy access to medicines, undergraduate students at health science colleges are likely to self-medicate. This research was undertaken to assess self-medication prevalence and its contributing factors among female undergraduate students in health science colleges at Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia. Materials and methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study involving 214 female students from the Majmaah University in Saudi Arabia's health science colleges-Medical: (82, 38.31%) and Applied Medical Science College (132, 61.68%)-was conducted. A self-administered questionnaire with sociodemographic information, drugs used, and reasons for self-medication was used for the survey. Non-probability sampling techniques were used to recruit participants. Results: Of the 214 female participants, 173, 80.84 % (medical: 82, 38.31% and applied medical science: 132, 61.68%) confirmed that they were on self-medication. The majority of participants (42.1%) were between the ages of 20 and 21.5 years (mean ± SD: 20.81 ± 1.4). The main reasons for self-medication were quick relief from the illness (77.5%) followed by saving time (76.3%), minor illnesses (71.1%), self-confidence (56.7%), and laziness (56.7%). The use of leftover drugs at home was common among applied medical science students (39.9%). The main indication for self-medication included menstrual problems (82.7 %), headache (79.8%), fever (72.8%), pain (71.1%), and stress (35.3%). The most common drugs used included antipyretic and analgesics (84.4%), antispasmodics (78.9%), antibiotics (76.9%), antacids (68.2%), multivitamins, and dietary supplements (66.5%). On the contrary, the least used drugs were antidepressants, anxiolytics, and sedatives (3.5, 5.8, and 7.5 %, respectively). Family members were the main source of information for self-medication (67.1%), followed by self-acquired knowledge (64.7%), social media (55.5%), and least were friends (31.2%). For adverse effects of the medication, the majority of them consulted the physician (85%) followed by consulting the pharmacist (56.7%) and switched to other drugs or decreased drug dosage. Quick relief, saving time, and minor illness were the main reasons for self-medication among health science college students. It is recommended to conduct awareness programs, workshops, and seminars to educate on the benefits and adverse effects of self-medication.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPrevalenceUniversitiesYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial Agentsadverse effectantispasmodicshealth science collegeslazinessquick reliefself-medicationsource of medication

Identifiers

PMID36875361
PMCPMC9978380
OpenAlexW4321109546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.