Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36875309›Full record

ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis

Perineural Invasion Predicts Unfavorable Prognosis in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer.

Keiko Hosoya, Makoto Wakahara, Kohei Ikeda, Yoshihisa Umekita

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keiko Hosoya *Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
Makoto Wakahara *Division of General Thoracic Surgery and Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
Kohei IkedaDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
Yoshihisa UmekitaDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
Tottori University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimPerineural invasion (PNI) is a poor prognostic factor in a variety of cancers. However, the frequency of PNI in invasive breast carcinoma varies among studies, and the prognostic significance of PNI remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to explore the prognostic value of PNI in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe cohort included 191 consecutive female patients who underwent surgical resection of invasive carcinoma of no special type (NOS). The correlations between PNI and clinicopathological characteristics including prognosis were investigated.

resultsThe frequency of PNI was 14.1% (27/191) and the PNI-positive status was significantly correlated with large pathological tumor size (p=0.005), lymph node metastasis (p=0.001), and lymphatic invasion (p=0.009). The log-rank test showed that PNI-positive patients had shorter distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (p=0.002) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (p<0.001). According to the multivariate analysis, PNI had a significant adverse effect on DMFS (p=0.037) and DSS (p=0.003).

conclusionPNI could be used as an independent poor prognostic indicator in patients with invasive breast carcinoma.

Indexed as

breast cancerinvasive carcinoma of no special typePerineural invasionprognostic factor

Identifiers

PMID36875309
PMCPMC9949536
OpenAlexW4323295135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.