Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36875271›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2022

Validation of the adapted clavien dindo in trauma (ACDiT) scale to grade management related complications at a level I trauma center.

Niladri Banerjee, Dinesh Bagaria, Harshit Agarwal, Anand Kumar Katiyar, Subodh Kumar, Sushma Sagar, Biplab Mishra, Amit Gupta

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Niladri BanerjeeDepartment of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6934-5216
Dinesh BagariaDivision of Trauma Surgery & Critical Care, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6950-3592
Harshit AgarwalDepartment of Trauma and Emergency, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rae Bareli, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6658-9626
Anand Kumar KatiyarDepartment of Surgery, Command Hospital (Northern Command), Udhampur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3315-5557
Subodh KumarDivision of Trauma Surgery & Critical Care, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8434-9629
Sushma SagarDivision of Trauma Surgery & Critical Care, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4700-9868
Biplab MishraDivision of Trauma Surgery & Critical Care, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2730-7315
Amit GuptaDivision of Trauma Surgery & Critical Care, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8912-0647
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · INCommand Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Complications during trauma management are the main factor responsible for the overall increase in treatment cost. There are very few grading systems to measure the burden of complications in trauma patients. A prospective study was conducted using the Adapted Clavien Dindo in Trauma (ACDiT) scale, with the primary aim of validating it at our center. As a secondary aim, it was also wanted to measure the mortality burden among our admitted patients. Material and Methods: The study was conducted at a dedicated trauma center. All patients with acute injuries, who were admitted, were included. An initial treatment plan was made within 24 hours of admission. Any deviation from this was recorded and graded according to the ACDiT. The grading was correlated with hospital-free days and ICU-free days within 30 days. Results: A total of 505 patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 31 years. The most common mechanism of injury was road traffic injury, with a median ISS and NISS of 13 and 14, respectively. Two hundred and forty-eight out of 505 patients had some grade of complication as determined by the ACDiT scale. Hospital-free days (13.5 vs. 25; p <0.001) were significantly lower in patients with complications than those without complications, and so were ICU-free days (29 vs. 30; p <0.001). Significant differences were also observed when comparing mean hospital free and ICU free days across various ACDiT grades. Overall mortality of the population was 8.3 %, the majority of whom were hypotensive on arrival and required ICU care. Conclusion: We successfully validated the ACDiT scale at our center. We recommend using this scale to objectively measure in-hospital complications and improve trauma management quality. ACDiT scale should be one of the data points in any trauma database/registry.

Indexed as

Morbidityoutcome assessmentquality improvementtrauma

Identifiers

PMID36875271
PMCPMC9979560
OpenAlexW4313909052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.