ArticleCureus2023
Isolated Tracheabronchomalacia Misdiagnosed for Years as Bronchial Asthma.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tracheomalacia (TM) is an abnormal collapse of the tracheal lumen, which often occurs when the cartilaginous part of the trachea has not developed. It is a rare condition but is seen often in infancy and childhood period. The incidence of primary airway malacia in children was estimated to be at least one in 2,100. It has a wide range of etiologies, and it is often localized but rarely generalized as in our case. It could be severe enough to indicate frequent admission and might expose the patient to multiple unnecessary medications. We are reporting a case with unusual primary tracheobronchomalacia (TBM) that was missed for several years with a huge burden on both families and healthcare providers. A five-year-old Saudi girl had multiple admissions to the intensive care unit with similar presentation each time, and she was misdiagnosed as having asthma exacerbation with an occasional chest infection. Bronchoscopy revealed the underlying condition, and the patient was kept on the minimal intervention of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and aggressive airway hydration therapy, all with the goal of improving the patient's outcome and reducing hospital admissions. We emphasize the importance of alerting physicians about malacia as an important cause of recurrent wheezy chest, which is one of the common asthma mimickers; in such cases, flexible bronchoscopy remains the gold standard diagnostic test, while the treatment remained supportive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.