Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36875208›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2023

Effectiveness of first and second COVID-19 mRNA vaccine monovalent booster doses during a period of circulation of Omicron variant sublineages: December 2021-July 2022.

Joshua G Petrie, Jennifer P King, David L McClure, Melissa A Rolfes, Jennifer K Meece, David Pattinson, Gabriele Neumann, Yoshihiro Kawaoka, Edward A Belongia, Huong Q McLean

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua G PetrieMarshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield Wisconsin USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5696-965X
Jennifer P KingMarshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield Wisconsin USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4627-1378
David L McClureMarshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield Wisconsin USA.
Melissa A RolfesInfluenza Division Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta Georgia USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0483-9941
Jennifer K MeeceMarshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield Wisconsin USA.
David PattinsonDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine University of Wisconsin- Madison Wisconsin USA.
Gabriele NeumannDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine University of Wisconsin- Madison Wisconsin USA.
Yoshihiro KawaokaDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine University of Wisconsin- Madison Wisconsin USA.
Edward A BelongiaMarshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield Wisconsin USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7478-0415
Huong Q McLeanMarshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield Wisconsin USA.
Marshfield Clinic · USUniversity of Wisconsin System · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: US recommendations for COVID-19 vaccine boosters have expanded in terms of age groups covered and numbers of doses recommended, whereas evolution of Omicron sublineages raises questions about ongoing vaccine effectiveness. Methods: We estimated effectiveness of monovalent COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccination versus two-dose primary series during a period of Omicron variant virus circulation in a community cohort with active illness surveillance. Hazard ratios comparing SARS-CoV-2 infection between booster versus primary series vaccinated individuals were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying booster status. Models were adjusted for age and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. The effectiveness of a second booster among adults ≥50 years of age was similarly estimated. Results: The analysis included 883 participants ranging in age, from 5 to >90 years. Relative effectiveness was 51% (95% CI: 34%, 64%) favoring the booster compared with primary series vaccination and did not vary by prior infection status. Relative effectiveness was 74% (95% CI: 57%, 84%) at 15 to 90 days after booster receipt, but declined to 42% (95% CI: 16%, 61%) after 91 to 180 days, and to 36% (95% CI: 3%, 58%) after 180 days. The relative effectiveness of a second booster compared to a single booster was 24% (95% CI: -40% to 61%). Conclusions: An mRNA vaccine booster dose added significant protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, but protection decreased over time. A second booster did not add significant protection for adults ≥50 years of age. Uptake of recommended bivalent boosters should be encouraged to increase protection against Omicron BA.4/BA.5 sublineages.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultAged, 80 and overHumansmRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerboosterCOVID‐19OmicronSARS‐CoV‐2vaccine effectivenesswaning

Identifiers

PMID36875208
PMCPMC9975792
OpenAlexW4323066758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.