ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
Tislelizumab for cervical cancer: A retrospective study and analysis of correlative blood biomarkers.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical benefit analysis of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic significance of C-reactive protein in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Low geriatric nutritional risk index as a poor prognostic biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in solid cancer.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- AI-assisted Radiomic Model for Cervical Cancer Recurrence Prediction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study with Experimental Validation.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Sacituzumab govitecan combined with tislelizumab as second-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: a case report and literature review.BMC women's health · 2026Review
- Design and Production of a Novel Anti-PD-1 Nanobody by CDR Grafting and Site-Directed Mutagenesis Approach.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Article
- Dynamic changes in peripheral blood immunophenotyping and its prognostic value in cervical cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint blockade therapy.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Complete remission of a high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastases treated with first-line tislelizumab plus bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy with maintenance therapy: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Role of lncRNA TPRG1-AS1 in the development of cervical squamous cell carcinoma and its prognostic value.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- The efficacy of first and second immunotherapy exposure in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- TIME Is Ticking for Cervical Cancer.Biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tislelizumab is an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody engineered to minimize binding to Fcγ receptors. It has been used to treat several solid tumors. However, its efficacy and toxicity, and the predictive and prognostic value of baseline hematological parameters in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (R/M CC) receiving tislelizumab remain unclear. Methods: We reviewed 115 patients treated for R/M CC with tislelizumab from March 2020 to June 2022 in our institute. The antitumor activity of tislelizumab was assessed using RECIST v1.1. Associations between the baseline hematological parameters and efficacy of tislelizumab in these patients were analyzed. Results: With a median follow-up of 11.3 months (range, 2.2-28.7), the overall response rate was 39.1% (95% CI, 30.1-48.2) and the disease control rate was 77.4% (95% CI, 69.6-85.2). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.6 months (95% CI, 10.7 to not reached). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 81.7% of the patients and only 7.0% of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 TRAEs. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed that the level of pretreatment serum C-reactive protein (CRP) was an independent risk factor for the response (complete or partial response) to tislelizumab and the PFS of R/M CC patients treated with tislelizumab ( Conclusions: Tislelizumab showed promising antitumor activity and tolerable toxicity in patients with R/M CC. The baseline serum CRP levels and CAR showed potential for predicting the efficacy of tislelizumab and the prognosis of R/M CC patients receiving tislelizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.