Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36875089›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Tislelizumab for cervical cancer: A retrospective study and analysis of correlative blood biomarkers.

Xiaojing Zheng, Haifeng Gu, Xinping Cao, Baoyue Pan, Huiling Xiang, Mingxiu Ju, Shijie Xu, Min Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaojing ZhengState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Haifeng GuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xinping CaoState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Baoyue PanState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Huiling XiangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Mingxiu JuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shijie XuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Min ZhengState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tislelizumab is an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody engineered to minimize binding to Fcγ receptors. It has been used to treat several solid tumors. However, its efficacy and toxicity, and the predictive and prognostic value of baseline hematological parameters in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (R/M CC) receiving tislelizumab remain unclear. Methods: We reviewed 115 patients treated for R/M CC with tislelizumab from March 2020 to June 2022 in our institute. The antitumor activity of tislelizumab was assessed using RECIST v1.1. Associations between the baseline hematological parameters and efficacy of tislelizumab in these patients were analyzed. Results: With a median follow-up of 11.3 months (range, 2.2-28.7), the overall response rate was 39.1% (95% CI, 30.1-48.2) and the disease control rate was 77.4% (95% CI, 69.6-85.2). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.6 months (95% CI, 10.7 to not reached). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 81.7% of the patients and only 7.0% of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 TRAEs. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed that the level of pretreatment serum C-reactive protein (CRP) was an independent risk factor for the response (complete or partial response) to tislelizumab and the PFS of R/M CC patients treated with tislelizumab ( Conclusions: Tislelizumab showed promising antitumor activity and tolerable toxicity in patients with R/M CC. The baseline serum CRP levels and CAR showed potential for predicting the efficacy of tislelizumab and the prognosis of R/M CC patients receiving tislelizumab.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkersC-Reactive Proteintislelizumabadverse eventsCARcervical cancerCRPefficacyprognosistislelizumab

Identifiers

PMID36875089
PMCPMC9975598
OpenAlexW4320918325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.