Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36875076›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Performance of an interferon-γ release assay-based test for cell-mediated immunity to SARS-CoV-2.

Luís Fonseca Brito, Silvia Tödter, Julian Kottlau, Kathrin Cermann, Anthea Spier, Elina Petersen, Ines Schäfer, Raphael Twerenbold, Martin Aepfelbacher, Marc Lütgehetmann and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luís Fonseca BritoInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Silvia TödterInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Julian KottlauInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Kathrin CermannInstitute of Microbiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Anthea SpierInstitute of Microbiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Elina PetersenDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ines SchäferDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Raphael TwerenboldDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin AepfelbacherInstitute of Microbiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Marc LütgehetmannInstitute of Microbiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Felix R StahlInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In search for immunological correlates of protection against acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) there is a need for high through-put assays for cell-mediated immunity (CMI) to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We established an interferon-γ release assay -based test for detection of CMI against SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) or nucleocapsid (NC) peptides. Blood samples obtained from 549 healthy or convalescent individuals were measured for interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production after peptide stimulation using a certified chemiluminescence immunoassay. Test performance was calculated applying cutoff values with the highest Youden indices in receiver-operating-characteristics curve analysis and compared to a commercially available serologic test. Potential confounders and clinical correlates were assessed for all test systems. 522 samples obtained from 378 convalescent in median 298 days after PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and 144 healthy control individuals were included in the final analysis. CMI testing had a sensitivity and specificity of up to 89% and 74% for S peptides and 89% and 91% for NC peptides, respectively. High white blood cell counts correlated negatively with IFN-γ responses but there was no CMI decay in samples obtained up to one year after recovery. Severe clinical symptoms at time of acute infection were associated with higher measures of adaptive immunity and reported hair loss at time of examination. This laboratory-developed test for CMI to SARS-CoV-2 NC peptides exhibits excellent test performance, is suitable for high through-put routine diagnostics, and should be evaluated for clinical outcome prediction in prospective pathogen re-exposure.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansImmunity, CellularInterferon-gamma Release TestsProspective StudiescoronavirusCOVID-19interferoninterferon gamma release assayQuantiFERONSARS-CoV-2T cell

Identifiers

PMID36875076
PMCPMC9978494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.