Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874975›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Assessment of the recovery and photosynthetic efficiency of

Joseph K Kihika, Susanna A Wood, Lesley Rhodes, Kirsty F Smith, Juliette Butler, Ken G Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph K KihikaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Susanna A WoodCawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
Lesley RhodesCawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
Kirsty F SmithCawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
Juliette ButlerCawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
Ken G RyanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many strains of Symbiodiniaceae have been isolated and their genetics, taxonomy, and metabolite production studied. Maintaining these cultures requires careful and regular sub-culturing that is costly with a high risk of species contamination or loss. Cryopreservation is a viable alternative for their long-term storage; however, there is uncertainty as to whether cryopreservation impacts the photosynthetic performance of Symbiodiniaceae. We investigated the growth rates and photosynthetic efficiency of two species,

Indexed as

CryopreservationDinoflagellidaCell CycleElectron TransportPhotosynthesisControlCryopreservationCryopreservedMaximum electron transport ratePAM fluorometryPhotosynthesisQuantum yieldRapid freezingRapid light curvesSymbiodiniaceae

Identifiers

PMID36874975
PMCPMC9983422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.