ArticleJVS-vascular science2023
Six-year outcomes of a phase II study of human-tissue engineered blood vessels for peripheral arterial bypass.
Article in JVS-vascular science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- 18 Month patency of acellular bioengineered regenerative conduit as coronary artery bypass.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Functional hydrogels in cardiovascular therapy: Design, applications and clinical challenges (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Small Diameter Vascular Grafts Made in Minutes.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- First European Clinical Implant of an Off-the-Shelf Bioengineered Blood Vessel for Coronary Artery Bypass.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Barriers to clinical translation of small-diameter tissue-engineered vascular grafts in peripheral reconstruction.JVS-vascular science · 2026Review
- Acellular Tissue Engineered Vessels as Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2025Article
- Bioengineered heart valves for personalized therapy: advances in manufacturing and clinical challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Short-term performance of Symvess (acellular tissue engineered vessel-tyod) compared to external control data for autologous vein in treatment of extremity arterial injury.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
- Bioengineering vascularization.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Review
- Harnessing the potential of monocytes/macrophages to regenerate tissue-engineered vascular grafts.Cardiovascular research · 2024Review
- Vascular Damage and Repair - Are Small-Diameter Vascular Grafts Still the "Holy Grail" of Tissue Engineering?Physiological research · 2024Review
- Expanded Utility of Human Acellular Vessel in Hemodialysis Access Surgery and Arterial Aneurysm Repair.Cureus · 2023Article
- Biological mechanisms of infection resistance in tissue engineered blood vessels compared to synthetic expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts.JVS-vascular science · 2023Article
- Editorial: Insights in cardiovascular biologics and regenerative medicine: 2022.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The human acellular vessel (HAV) was evaluated for surgical bypass in a phase II study. The primary results at 24 months after implantation have been reported, and the patients will be evaluated for ≤10 years. Methods: In the present report, we have described the 6-year results of a prospective, open-label, single-treatment arm, multicenter study. Patients with advanced peripheral artery disease (PAD) requiring above-the-knee femoropopliteal bypass surgery without available autologous graft options had undergone implantation with the HAV, a bioengineered human tissue replacement blood vessel. The patients who completed the 24-month primary portion of the study will be evaluated for ≤10 years after implantation. The present mid-term analysis was performed at the 6-year milestone (72 months) for patients followed up for 24 to 72 months. Results: HAVs were implanted in 20 patients at three sites in Poland. Seven patients had discontinued the study before completing the 2-year portion of the study: four after graft occlusion had occurred and three who had died of causes deemed unrelated to the conduit, with the HAV reported as functional at their last visit. The primary results at 24 months showed primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates of 58%, 58%, and 74%, respectively. One vessel had developed a pseudoaneurysm deemed possibly iatrogenic; no other signs of structural failure were reported. No rejections or infections of the HAV occurred, and no patient had required amputation of the implanted limb. Of the 20 patients, 13 had completed the primary portion of the study; however, 1 patient had died shortly after 24 months. Of the remaining 12 patients, 3 died of causes unrelated to the HAV. One patient had required thrombectomy twice, with secondary patency achieved. No other interventions were recorded between 24 and 72 months. At 72 months, five patients had a patent HAV, including four patients with primary patency. For the entire study population from day 1 to month 72, the overall primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rate estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis was 44%, 45%, and 60% respectively, with censoring for death. No patient had experienced rejection or infection of the HAV, and no patient had required amputation of the implanted limb. Conclusions: The infection-resistant, off-the-shelf HAV could provide a durable alternative conduit in the arterial circuit setting to restore the lower extremity blood supply in patients with PAD, with remodeling into the recipient's own vessel over time. The HAV is currently being evaluated in seven clinical trials to treat PAD, vascular trauma, and as a hemodialysis access conduit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.