Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874954›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2023

Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions.

Francisco Jurado-Rueda, Lola Alonso-Guirado, Tomin E Perea-Cham-Blee, Oliver T Elliott, Ioan Filip, Raúl Rabadán, Núria Malats

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francisco Jurado-RuedaGenetic & Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre and CIBERONC, Madrid 28029, Spain.
Lola Alonso-GuiradoGenetic & Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre and CIBERONC, Madrid 28029, Spain.
Tomin E Perea-Cham-BleeProgram for Mathematical Genomics and Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Oliver T ElliottProgram for Mathematical Genomics and Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Ioan FilipProgram for Mathematical Genomics and Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Raúl RabadánProgram for Mathematical Genomics and Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Núria MalatsGenetic & Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre and CIBERONC, Madrid 28029, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2538-3784

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Here, we performed a benchmarking analysis of five tools for microbe sequence detection using transcriptomics data (Kraken2, MetaPhlAn2, PathSeq, DRAC and Pandora). We built a synthetic database mimicking real-world structure with tuned conditions accounting for microbe species prevalence, base calling quality and sequence length. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) parameters, as well as computational requirements, were used for tool ranking. Results: GATK PathSeq showed the highest sensitivity on average and across all scenarios considered. However, the main drawback of this tool was its slowness. Kraken2 was the fastest tool and displayed the second-best sensitivity, though with large variance depending on the species to be classified. There was no significant difference for the other three algorithms sensitivity. The sensitivity of MetaPhlAn2 and Pandora was affected by sequence number and DRAC by sequence quality and length. Results from this study support the use of Kraken2 for routine microbiome profiling based on its competitive sensitivity and runtime performance. Nonetheless, we strongly endorse to complement it by combining with MetaPhlAn2 for thorough taxonomic analyses. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/fjuradorueda/MIME/ and https://github.com/lola4/DRAC/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at

Identifiers

PMID36874954
PMCPMC9976984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.