SynthesisBioMed research international2023
Usability Evaluation of Dashboards: A Systematic Literature Review of Tools.
Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of a clinical dashboard for nephrology inpatients: a pilot study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Development and Usability of a Dashboard for Quality Monitoring and Resident-Centered Care in Australian Residential Long-Term Care: Mixed-Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Building Public Health Data Dashboards: Tutorial Playbook.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
- EStiMapp: A practical tool for mapping clinical symptoms evoked by electrical stimulation in intracranial EEG for epilepsy surgery.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Article
- Underground mine rescue robotic systems: insights into human-robot information exchange.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- Interactive Dashboards for Modeling-Based Education: Methods and Best Practices with Python and Plotly Dash.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Towards Explainable Multimodal Sensing for Swimming Analysis: Early Findings from the SWIM-360 Project.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From glitter to gold: recommendations for effective dashboards from design through sustainment.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Prioritizing clinical data for psychiatric inpatient dashboards: insights from a nationwide survey of German university centers.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Validation of a Scorecard of Quality and Activity Indicators for Telepharmacy Pharmaceutical Care Services in Spanish Hospitals.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2025Article
- From Data to Decision: Design and Evaluation of a Patient Safety Dashboard.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Usability and usefulness of U. S. federal and state public health data dashboards: implications for improving data access and use.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Democratizing social media for health research: LLM-powered data analytics platform for NCDs.PloS one · 2025Article
- Development, Implementation, and Evaluation Methods for Dashboards in Health Care: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Using co-design to understand consumer's health information-seeking behaviours and design preferences for a new digital clinical dashboard in aged care.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Use It or Lose It: Facilitating the Use of Interactive Data Apps in Psychological Research Data Sharing.Europe's journal of psychology · 2024Article
- Human Factors and Organizational Issues in Health Informatics: Review of Recent Developments and Advances.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Review
- Evaluation of different landing pages on behavioural engagement with the CARA dashboard: A user research protocol.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Umbrella review of healthcare dashboards: Applications, benefits, design, and challenges.Digital healthReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, the use of dashboards in healthcare has been considered an effective approach for the visual presentation of information to support clinical and administrative decisions. Effective and efficient use of dashboards in clinical and managerial processes requires a framework for the design and development of tools based on usability principles. Objectives: The present study is aimed at investigating the existing questionnaires used for the usability evaluation framework of dashboards and at presenting more specific usability criteria for evaluating dashboards. Methods: This systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, without any time restrictions. The final search of articles was performed on September 2, 2022. Data collection was performed using a data extraction form, and the content of selected studies was analyzed based on the dashboard usability criteria. Results: After reviewing the full text of relevant articles, a total of 29 studies were selected according to the inclusion criteria. Regarding the questionnaires used in the selected studies, researcher-made questionnaires were used in five studies, while 25 studies applied previously used questionnaires. The most widely used questionnaires were the System Usability Scale (SUS), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Situation Awareness Rating Technique (SART), Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS), Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), and Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES), respectively. Finally, dashboard evaluation criteria, including usefulness, operability, learnability, ease of use, suitability for tasks, improvement of situational awareness, satisfaction, user interface, content, and system capabilities, were suggested. Conclusion: General questionnaires that were not specifically designed for dashboard evaluation were mainly used in reviewed studies. The current study suggested specific criteria for measuring the usability of dashboards. When selecting the usability evaluation criteria for dashboards, it is important to pay attention to the evaluation objectives, dashboard features and capabilities, and context of use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.