Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874824›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

The reality of virtual reality.

Benjamin Schöne, Joanna Kisker, Leon Lange, Thomas Gruber, Sophia Sylvester, Roman Osinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Promises and Pitfalls of Virtual Reality.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin SchöneExperimental Psychology I, Institute of Psychology, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Joanna KiskerExperimental Psychology I, Institute of Psychology, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Leon LangeDifferential Psychology and Personality Research, Institute of Psychology, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Thomas GruberExperimental Psychology I, Institute of Psychology, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Sophia SylvesterSemantic Information Systems Research Group, Institute of Computer Science, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Roman OsinskyDifferential Psychology and Personality Research, Institute of Psychology, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) has become a popular tool for investigating human behavior and brain functions. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether VR constitutes an actual form of reality or is more like an advanced simulation. Determining the nature of VR has been mostly achieved by self-reported presence measurements, defined as the feeling of being submerged in the experience. However, subjective measurements might be prone to bias and, most importantly, do not allow for a comparison with real-life experiences. Here, we show that real-life and VR height exposures using 3D-360° videos are mostly indistinguishable on a psychophysiological level (EEG and HRV), while both differ from a conventional 2D laboratory setting. Using a fire truck, three groups of participants experienced a real-life (

Indexed as

anxietyEEGheightHRVvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID36874824
PMCPMC9975753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.