Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874665›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Recent Caries Removal Techniques: An In Vitro Study.

Nikhil Sharma, Suruchi Sisodia, Arvind Jain, Triveni Bhargava, Pratiksha Kumar, Kuldeep Singh Rana

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of enzymatic chemo-mechanical agents on adhesion of composite resin to dentin of permanent teeth: an in vitro study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nikhil SharmaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Modern Dental College and Research Centre, Indore, IND.
Suruchi SisodiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Modern Dental College and Research Centre, Indore, IND.
Arvind JainDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, IND.
Triveni BhargavaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, IND.
Pratiksha KumarDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, IND.
Kuldeep Singh RanaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, IND.
Manubhai Patel Dental College and Hospital · INSri Aurobindo Institute of Technology · INGovernment College of Science · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDentistry is undergoing a gentle revolution that will consign drill and fill to history. In order to increase the acceptance of dental treatment, efforts are directed toward changing traditional painful dentistry into a new concept of painless dentistry. It is common practice to utilize burs for caries removal and cavity preparation. Chemomechanical caries removal is a painless procedure that uses a chemical substance to eradicate diseased dentine. With the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of Erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er: YAG) laser systems for caries removal and cavity preparation, the discipline of laser operational dentistry was born out of a desire to find a way to remove the decay without causing any pain or stress to the surrounding healthy tissue. AIM AND

objectivesThis in vitro research aimed to assess the relative advantages of chemomechanical and laser caries extraction techniques in comparison to the more traditional bur technique. The efficacy of each method was evaluated by microscopic examination of samples treated with each experimental method. We also evaluated the efficiency of each method by recording the time required for caries excavation. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe methods used for caries excavation were bur excavation, chemo-mechanical method, and laser method. Histological slices were produced after all the samples had been treated with the experimental techniques, and they were studied using a binocular light transmission microscope. The samples were then scored as '0' for absence and '1' for the presence of demineralized dentine. These scores and the time recorded for each method were subjected to statistical analysis.

resultsThis study found no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of the different approaches to removing caries; however, bur excavation was the quickest and chemo-mechanical was the slowest, with the latter not being useful in cases with low caries activity. The laser method of caries removal doesn't remove caries existing in the undercut areas of the cavity thus making the use of bur mandatory.

conclusionWith more practice and experience, the chemo-mechanical and laser methods can be used in a more efficient way to render painless operative procedures to patients.

Indexed as

bur excavationdemineralized dentinedental carieslaserpapacarie

Identifiers

PMID36874665
PMCPMC9979096
OpenAlexW4318615203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.