ArticlePhotoacoustics2023
Ultrafast measurement of laser-induced shock waves.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Questioning the ASTM G32-16 (stationary specimen) standard cavitation erosion test.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present measurements of laser-induced shockwave pressure rise time in liquids on a sub-nanosecond scale, using custom-designed single-mode fiber optic hydrophone. The measurements are aimed at the study of the shockwave generation process, helping to improve the effectiveness of various applications and decrease possible accidental damage from shockwaves. The developed method allows measurement of the fast shockwave rise time as close as 10 µm from an 8 µm sized laser-induced plasma shockwave source, significantly improving the spatial and temporal resolution of the pressure measurement over other types of hydrophones. The spatial and temporal limitations of the presented hydrophone measurements are investigated theoretically, with actual experimental results agreeing well with the predictions. To demonstrate the capabilities of the fast sensor, we were able to show that the shockwave rise time is linked to liquid viscosity exhibiting logarithmic dependency in the low viscosity regime (from 0.4 cSt to 50 cSt). Additionally, the shockwave rise time dependency on propagation distance close to the source in water was investigated, with shock wave rise times measured down to only 150 ps. It was found that at short propagation distances in water halving the shock wave peak pressure results in the rise time increase by approximately factor of 1.6. These results extend the understanding of shockwave behavior in low viscosity liquids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.