Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874581›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2022

Case Report: The effect of intravenous and oral antibiotics on the gut microbiome and breath volatile organic compounds over one year.

Farah Shahi, Sarah Forrester, Kelly Redeker, James P J Chong, Gavin Barlow

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Farah ShahiDepartment of Biology, University of York, UK, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6212-6181
Sarah ForresterDepartment of Biology, University of York, UK, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8332-7196
Kelly RedekerDepartment of Biology, University of York, UK, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1903-2286
James P J ChongDepartment of Biology, University of York, UK, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9447-7421
Gavin BarlowDepartment of Infection, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, HU3 2JZ, UK.
University of York · GBUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global concern and better understanding of the gut microbiome, a known 'amplifier' of AMR, may allow future clinicians to tailor therapy to minimise this risk and offer a personalised medicine approach. To examine the gut microbiome, patients are required to provide faecal samples; more convenient and cheaper solutions need to be found.

methodsAs part of a pilot study looking at how routes of administration affect the gut microbiome in NHS patients undergoing routine clinical management for infections, we hypothesised that effects on the gut microbiome varied with the route and metabolism of antibiotic used, and these changes may be reflected in breath metabolites. We present a case report of a patient with an unusual clinical history, alongside breath metabolite and gut microbiome data taken before, during and after antibiotic therapy over a period of one year.

resultsWe noted a shift in the dominant

conclusionsThis study provides a framework for similar future work and highlights the need for further research on the relationships between changes in microbial gut communities and antimicrobial exposure, patient clinical status, and the metabolites of human breath.

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobialsbreath metabolitesmicrobiomeresistancevolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID36874581
PMCPMC9975432
OpenAlexW4211041683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.