ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023
Impact of the K-line in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Analysis of sagittal cervical curvature changes and surgical outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Controversies surrounding posterior cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with kyphotic deformity.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Exploratory Cluster-Based Radiographic Phenotyping of Degenerative Cervical Disorder: A Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship of the K-line with sagittal cervical curvature changes and surgical outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 84 patients with OPLL who underwent posterior cervical single-door laminoplasty. The patients were divided into a K-line-positive (+) group and a K-line-negative (-) group. Perioperative data, radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Of 84 total patients, 50 patients were in the K (+) group and 29 patients were in the K (-) group. Neurological function improved in both groups after laminoplasty. The C2-7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis were significantly changed in the K(-) group compared with those in the K (+) group before the operation and at the 3-month and final follow-ups. Conclusion: Neurological function was recovered in both groups, and the clinical effect on the K (+) group was better than that on the K (-) group. The cervical curvature in patients with OPLL tends to be anteverted and kyphotic after laminoplasty and is an important factor in reducing the clinical effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.