ArticleCancer research communications2022
Conduit CAR: Redirecting CAR T-Cell Specificity with A Universal and Adaptable Bispecific Antibody Platform.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modular (universal) CAR-T platformsFrontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Preclinical advances and mechanistic insights of CAR-T therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: from target iteration to microenvironment regulation.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- An inducible signal 1 booster overcomes limited access to antigen for solid tumor cell therapy.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Article
- The Current Landscape of Modular CAR T Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor therapies: Development, design, and implementation.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
- UniCAR T-Cell Potency-A Matter of Affinity between Adaptor Molecules and Adaptor CAR T-Cells?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- ReCARving the future: bridging CAR T-cell therapy gaps with synthetic biology, engineering, and economic insights.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Universal CAR 2.0 to overcome current limitations in CAR therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Immunotargeting of Cancer Stem Cells.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy against hematologic malignancies has altered the treatment paradigm for patients with these diseases. Nevertheless, the occurrence of relapse due to antigen escape or heterogeneous antigen expression on tumors remains a challenge for first-generation CAR T-cell therapies as only a single tumor antigen can be targeted. To address this limitation and to add a further level of tunability and control to CAR T-cell therapies, adapter or universal CAR T-cell approaches use a soluble mediator to bridge CAR T cells with tumor cells. Adapter CARs allow simultaneous or sequential targeting of multiple tumor antigens, control of immune synapse geometry, dose control, and the potential for improved safety. Herein, we described a novel CAR T-cell adapter platform that relies on a bispecific antibody (BsAb) targeting both a tumor antigen and the GGGGS (G Significance: New approaches are needed to address relapsed/refractory disease and manage potential toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy. We describe an adapter CAR approach to redirect CAR T cells to engage novel TAA-expressing cells via a BsAb targeting a linker present on many clinical CAR T-cell therapeutics. We anticipate the use of such adapters could increase CAR T-cell efficacy and reduce potential CAR-associated toxicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.