Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874367›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2023

Eye-movement analysis on facial expression for identifying children and adults with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Kota Iwauchi, Hiroki Tanaka, Kosuke Okazaki, Yasuhiro Matsuda, Mitsuhiro Uratani, Tsubasa Morimoto, Satoshi Nakamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kota IwauchiAugmented Human Communication Laboratory, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.
Hiroki TanakaAugmented Human Communication Laboratory, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.
Kosuke OkazakiDepartment of Psychiatry, Nara Medical University School of Medicine, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Yasuhiro MatsudaDepartment of Psychiatry, Nara Medical University School of Medicine, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Mitsuhiro UrataniDepartment of Psychiatry, Nara Medical University School of Medicine, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Tsubasa MorimotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Nara Medical University School of Medicine, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Satoshi NakamuraAugmented Human Communication Laboratory, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experienced psychiatrists identify people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia (Sz) through interviews based on diagnostic criteria, their responses, and various neuropsychological tests. To improve the clinical diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders such as ASD and Sz, the discovery of disorder-specific biomarkers and behavioral indicators with sufficient sensitivity is important. In recent years, studies have been conducted using machine learning to make more accurate predictions. Among various indicators, eye movement, which can be easily obtained, has attracted much attention and various studies have been conducted for ASD and Sz. Eye movement specificity during facial expression recognition has been studied extensively in the past, but modeling taking into account differences in specificity among facial expressions has not been conducted. In this paper, we propose a method to detect ASD or Sz from eye movement during the Facial Emotion Identification Test (FEIT) while considering differences in eye movement due to the facial expressions presented. We also confirm that weighting using the differences improves classification accuracy. Our data set sample consisted of 15 adults with ASD and Sz, 16 controls, and 15 children with ASD and 17 controls. Random forest was used to weight each test and classify the participants as control, ASD, or Sz. The most successful approach used heat maps and convolutional neural networks (CNN) for eye retention. This method classified Sz in adults with 64.5% accuracy, ASD in adults with up to 71.0% accuracy, and ASD in children with 66.7% accuracy. Classifying of ASD result was significantly different (p<.05) by the binomial test with chance rate. The results show a 10% and 16.7% improvement in accuracy, respectively, compared to a model that does not take facial expressions into account. In ASD, this indicates that modeling is effective, which weights the output of each image.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorderconvolutional neural networkseye movementfacial emotion recognitionschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID36874367
PMCPMC9978093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.