Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874352›Full record

ArticleInformation processing & management2023

Preventing profiling for ethical fake news detection.

Liesbeth Allein, Marie-Francine Moens, Domenico Perrotta

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Information processing & management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liesbeth AlleinEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Italy.
Marie-Francine MoensDepartment of Computer Science, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Domenico PerrottaEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A news article's online audience provides useful insights about the article's identity. However, fake news classifiers using such information risk relying on profiling. In response to the rising demand for ethical AI, we present a profiling-avoiding algorithm that leverages Twitter users during model optimisation while excluding them when an article's veracity is evaluated. For this, we take inspiration from the social sciences and introduce two objective functions that maximise correlation between the article and its spreaders, and among those spreaders. We applied our profiling-avoiding algorithm to three popular neural classifiers and obtained results on fake news data discussing a variety of news topics. The positive impact on prediction performance demonstrates the soundness of the proposed objective functions to integrate social context in text-based classifiers. Moreover, statistical visualisation and dimension reduction techniques show that the user-inspired classifiers better discriminate between unseen fake and true news in their latent spaces. Our study serves as a stepping stone to resolve the underexplored issue of profiling-dependent decision-making in user-informed fake news detection.

Indexed as

Constrained representation learningEthicsFake news detectionNatural language processingProfiling

Identifiers

PMID36874352
PMCPMC9950332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.