ArticleCureus2023
Cerebral Fat Embolism Syndrome in a Patient With an Aortic Dissection and Orthopedic Injuries: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in adults and can be associated with severe secondary complications, including post-traumatic cerebral infarction. One potential cause of post-traumatic cerebral infarction is cerebral fat embolism syndrome (FES). We present a case in which a male in his twenties was involved in a motorcycle collision with a truck. He sustained numerous injuries, including bilateral femur fractures, left acetabular, open left tibial and fibular fractures, and a type A aortic dissection. Before orthopedic fixation, his Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) was 10. Following open reduction and internal fixation, his GCS was noted to be 4, with a stable computed tomography scan of the head. The differential included embolic strokes related to his dissection, an unrecognized cervical spine injury, and cerebral FES. Stat magnetic resonance imaging of the head demonstrated a starfield pattern of restricted diffusion consistent with cerebral FES. An intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor was placed, and his ICP acutely spiked to over 100 mmHg despite maximal medical management. This case highlights several key learning points, namely, that cerebral FES should remain in the mind of any physician treating high-energy multisystem traumas. While it is a rare syndrome, its effects can lead to significant morbidity and mortality as treatment is controversial and can conflict with the treatment of other systemic injuries. Further research into prevention and treatment is warranted to continue optimizing outcomes following cerebral FES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.