Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874283›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2023

Coercion in intensive care, an insufficiently explored issue-a scoping review of qualitative narratives of patient's experiences.

Susanne Joebges, Corine Mouton-Dorey, Bara Ricou, Nikola Biller-Andorno

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susanne JoebgesClinic for Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care Medicine and Postoperative Pain Therapy, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9509-8631
Corine Mouton-DoreyInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Bara RicouDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Surgery Intensive Care, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nikola Biller-AndornoInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The use of coercion, in a clinical context as imposing a measure against a patient's opposition or declared will, can occur in various forms in intensive care units (ICU). One prime example of a formal coercive measure in the ICU is the use of restraints, which are applied for patients' own safety. Through a database search, we sought to evaluate patient experiences related to coercive measures. Results: For this scoping review, clinical databases were searched for qualitative studies. A total of nine were identified that fulfilled the inclusion and the CASP criteria. Common themes emerging from the studies on patient experiences included communication issues, delirium, and emotional reactions. Statements from patients revealed feelings of compromised autonomy and dignity that came with a loss of control. Physical restraints were only one concrete manifestation of formal coercion as perceived by patients in the ICU setting. Conclusion: There are few qualitative studies focusing on patient experiences of formal coercive measures in the ICU. In addition to the experience of restricted physical movement, the perception of loss of control, loss of dignity, and loss of autonomy suggests that restraining measures are just one element in a setting that may be perceived as informal coercion.

Indexed as

coercionethicsintensive care unit (ICU)patient experiencesrestraint

Identifiers

PMID36874283
PMCPMC9975803
OpenAlexW4224246528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.