Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874231›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2023

A Scoping Review of Gaps Identified by Primary Care Providers in Caring for Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain.

Virginia McEwen, Mihal Michelle Esterlis, R Gianni Lorello, Abhimanyu Sud, F Marina Englesakis, Anuj Bhatia

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pain Research and Treatment: Policy Implications.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. [Enhancing Chronic Pain Management: Exploring the Essential Contribution of Primary Care Nurses].Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Virginia McEwenChronic Pain Management Program, St. Joseph's Care Group, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-749X
Mihal Michelle EsterlisDepartment of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-0671
R Gianni LorelloDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-1748
Abhimanyu SudDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8354-6153
F Marina EnglesakisLibrary & Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2199-1056
Anuj BhatiaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6292-8654
University Health Network · CAThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre · CAToronto Metropolitan University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction/Aim: Primary care providers (PCPs), who provide the bulk of care for patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP), often report knowledge gaps, limited resources, and difficult patient encounters while managing chronic pain. This scoping review seeks to evaluate gaps identified by PCPs in providing care to patients with chronic pain. Methods: The Arksey and O'Malley framework was used for this scoping review. A broad literature search was conducted for relevant articles on gaps in knowledge and skills of PCPs and in their health care environment for managing chronic pain, with multiple search term derivatives for concepts of interest. Articles from the initial search were screened for relevance, yielding 31 studies. Inductive and deductive thematic analysis was adopted. Results: The studies included in this review reflected a variety of study designs, settings, and methods. However, consistent themes emerged with respect to gaps in knowledge and skills for assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and interprofessional roles in chronic pain, as well as broader systemic issues including attitudes toward CNCP. A general lack of confidence in tapering high dose or ineffective opioid regimes, professional isolation, challenges in managing patients with CNCP with complex needs, and limited access to pain specialists were reported by PCPs. Discussion/Conclusions: This scoping review revealed common elements across the selected studies that will be useful in guiding creation of targeted supports for PCPs to manage CNCP. This review also yielded insights for pain clinicians at tertiary centers for supporting their PCP colleagues as well as systemic reforms required to support patients with CNCP.

Indexed as

chronic noncancer painmedical educationprimary care providersscoping review

Identifiers

PMID36874231
PMCPMC9980640
OpenAlexW4309074614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.