Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874227›Full record

ReviewResources, conservation, and recycling2023

Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints.

Sergiy Smetana, Dusan Ristic, Daniel Pleissner, Hanna L Tuomisto, Oleksii Parniakov, Volker Heinz

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Resources, conservation, and recycling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plant-based and sustainable diet: A systematic review of its impact on obesity.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Environmental Impacts of Cultivated (Lab-Based) Blue Foods.Environmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. From Charcuterie to Plant-Based: HarnessingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Have the environmental benefits of insect farming been overstated? A critical review.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Environmental Sustainability of Cultivated Meat.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  16. AnFrontiers in toxicology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sergiy SmetanaGerman Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Germany.
Dusan RisticGerman Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Germany.
Daniel PleissnerInstitute for Food and Environmental Research (ILU e. V.), Germany.
Hanna L TuomistoHelsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), University of Helsinki, Finland.
Oleksii ParniakovElea Vertriebs- und Vermarktungsgesellschaft mbH, Germany.
Volker HeinzGerman Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Germany.
German Institute of Food Technologies · DEAFS Entwicklungs und Vertriebs (Germany) · DELeuphana University of Lüneburg · DEUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modern food system is characterized with high environmental impact, which is in many cases associated with increased rates of animal production and overconsumption. The adoption of alternatives to meat proteins (insects, plants, mycoprotein, microalgae, cultured meat, etc.) might potentially influence the environmental impact and human health in a positive or negative way but could also trigger indirect impacts with higher consumption rates. Current review provides a condensed analysis on potential environmental impacts, resource consumption rates and unintended trade-offs associated with integration of alternative proteins in complex global food system in the form of meat substitutes. We focus on emissions of greenhouse gases, land use, non-renewable energy use and water footprint highlighted for both ingredients used for meat substitutes and ready products. The benefits and limitations of meat substitution are highlighted in relation to a weight and protein content. The analysis of the recent research literature allowed us to define issues, that require the attention of future studies.

Indexed as

Alternative protein sourcesEnvironmental impactLCALife cycle assessmentMeat alternativesMeat substitutes

Identifiers

PMID36874227
PMCPMC9936781
OpenAlexW4311837566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.